首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator.
【24h】

Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator.

机译:使用美国白内障和屈光外科医师协会的眼后晶状体屈光度数人工晶状体屈光度计算器评估眼内晶状体屈光度预测方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction after previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery IOL power calculator. SETTING: Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and private practice, Mesa, Arizona, USA. METHODS: The following methods were evaluated: methods using pre-LASIK/PRK keratometry (K) and surgically induced change in refraction, methods using surgically induced change in refraction, and methods using no previous data. The predicted IOL power was calculated with each method using the actual refraction after cataract surgery as the target. The IOL prediction error was calculated as the implanted IOL power minus the predicted IOL power. Arithmetic and absolute IOL prediction errors, variances in mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, and percentage of eyes within +/-0.50 diopter (D) and +/-1.00 D of refractive prediction errors were calculated. RESULTS: Methods using surgically induced change in refraction or no previous data had significantly smaller mean absolute IOL prediction errors, smaller variances, and a greater percentage of eyes within +/-0.50 D and +/-1.00 D of refractive prediction errors than methods using pre-LASIK/PRK keratometry (K) values and surgically induced change in refraction (all P<.05 with Bonferroni correction). There were no statistically significant differences between methods using surgically induced change in refraction and methods using no previous data. CONCLUSION: Methods using surgically induced change in refraction and methods using no previous data gave better results than methods using pre-LASIK/PRK K values and surgically induced change in refraction.
机译:目的:使用美国白内障和屈光手术学会IOL功率计算器,评估先前的激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)或光折射角膜切除术(PRK)后人工晶状体(IOL)功率预测方法的准确性。地点:得克萨斯州休斯敦贝勒医学院的卡伦眼科研究所和美国亚利桑那州梅萨的私人诊所。方法:评估了以下方法:使用LASIK术前/ PRK角膜曲率法(K)和手术引起的屈光度变化的方法,使用手术引起的屈光度变化的方法以及未使用以前数据的方法。以白内障手术后的实际屈光度为目标,使用每种方法计算预测的IOL屈光力。将IOL预测误差计算为植入的IOL功率减去预测的IOL功率。计算算术和绝对IOL预测误差,平均算术IOL预测误差的方差以及屈光预测误差的+/- 0.50屈光度(D)和+/- 1.00 D内的眼睛百分比。结果:与使用屈光性预测误差的方法相比,采用手术诱发的屈光变化或无先前数据的方法的平均绝对IOL预测误差明显较小,方差较小,并且屈光性预测误差在+/- 0.50 D和+/- 1.00 D之内的眼睛百分比更高LASIK / PRK术前角膜曲率(K)值和手术引起的屈光度变化(使用Bonferroni校正的所有P <0.05)。使用手术引起的屈光改变的方法与不使用先前数据的方法之间没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:采用手术诱发的屈光改变的方法和没有以前数据的方法比使用LASIK / PRK K前值和手术诱发的屈光改变的方法效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号