...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Testing the dioptric power accuracy of exact-power-labeled intraocular lenses.
【24h】

Testing the dioptric power accuracy of exact-power-labeled intraocular lenses.

机译:测试精确度数标记的人工晶状体的屈光度数准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To test the accuracy of exact-power-labeled intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a limited independent study. SETTING: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Optical Testing Lab. METHODS: Hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were measured using a new confocal laser method for dioptric power measurement per International Organization for Standards standard 11979-2 and American National Standards Institute standard Z80.7. Some of the IOLs were measured at 22 degrees C and 35 degrees C. RESULTS: For the 18 IOLs tested, the mean difference between the manufacturer's exact labeled power (D(EL)) and the power measured in the study (D(M)) was 0.18 diopter (D) +/- 0.12 (SD) and between D(M) and the usual normal rounded-off (0.50 D steps) dioptric power (D(UL)) labeling, 0.23 +/- 0.09 D (difference 0.05 D). For 15.00 to 20.0 D IOLs, the mean difference between D(M) and D(EL) was 0.08 +/- 0.05 D and between D(M) and D(UL), 0.17 +/- 0.06 D (difference 0.09 D). For IOLs of 20.00 D or greater, the mean difference between D(M) and D(EL) was 0.24 +/- 0.11 D and between D(M) and D(UL), 0.27 D +/- 0.08 D (difference 0.03 D). When the IOL hydration temperature increased from 22 degrees C to 35 degrees C (4 IOLs tested), the IOL power increase on average was approximately 0.13 D. CONCLUSIONS: The small improvement in power-prediction accuracy for exact-power-labeled IOLs decreased in IOLs of 20.00 D or greater. For IOLs of 15.00 to 20.00 D, the increased accuracy (+/-0.09 D) was statistically significant and could increase predictability of postoperative refractions. Acrylic dioptric power was directly proportional to temperature.
机译:目的:在一项有限的独立研究中测试精确度数标记的人工晶状体(IOL)的准确性。地点:美国食品药品监督管理局光学测试实验室。方法:根据国际标准组织标准11979-2和美国国家标准协会标准Z80.7,使用新的共聚焦激光方法测量亲水性丙烯酸IOL的屈光度。一些IOL在22摄氏度和35摄氏度下测量。结果:对于测试的18个IOL,制造商的精确标记功率(D(EL))与研究中测量的功率(D(M)之间的平均差) )为0.18屈光度(D)+/- 0.12(SD),在D(M)与通常的正常四舍五入(0.50 D步)屈光度(D(UL))标记之间,为0.23 +/- 0.09 D(差0.05 D)。对于15.00至20.0 D的IOL,D(M)和D(EL)之间的平均差为0.08 +/- 0.05 D,D(M)和D(UL)之间的平均差为0.17 +/- 0.06 D(差0.09 D) 。对于20.00 D或更高的IOL,D(M)和D(EL)之间的平均差为0.24 +/- 0.11 D,D(M)和D(UL)之间的平均差为0.27 D +/- 0.08 D(差异0.03 D)。当IOL水化温度从22摄氏度增加到35摄氏度(测试了4个IOL)时,IOL功率平均增加了约0.13D。结论:精确功率标记的IOL的功率预测精度的小幅提高降低了IOL为20.00 D或更高。对于15.00至20.00 D的IOL,提高的准确性(+/- 0.09 D)在统计学上是显着的,并且可以提高术后验光的可预测性。丙烯酸屈光度与温度成正比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号