首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Phase III noninferiority trial comparing irinotecan with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously treated with fluorouracil: N9841.
【24h】

Phase III noninferiority trial comparing irinotecan with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously treated with fluorouracil: N9841.

机译:III期非劣效性试验,将伊立替康与奥沙利铂,氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙用于先前接受氟尿嘧啶治疗的晚期结直肠癌患者:N9841。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this multicenter phase III trial was to determine whether overall survival (OS) of fluorouracil (FU) -refractory patients was noninferior when treated with second-line infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4; arm B) versus irinotecan (arm A). Cross-over to the other treatment on disease progression was mandated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who experienced treatment failure with one prior FU-based therapy and had not received prior irinotecan or oxaliplatin, either for metastatic disease or within 6 months of adjuvant FU therapy, were randomly assigned to arm A (irinotecan 350 or 300 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) or arm B (FOLFOX4). RESULTS: A total of 491 patients were randomly assigned (arm A, n = 245; arm B, n = 246); 288 (59%) had experienced treatment failure with FU for metastatic colorectal cancer. Two hundred twenty-seven patients (46%) received protocol-mandated third-line therapy (arm A, 43%; arm B, 57%). Median survival was 13.8 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 15.0 months) for initial treatment with FOLFOX4 and 14.3 months (95% CI, 12.0 to 15.9 months) for irinotecan (P = .38; hazard ratio = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.1). Response rates (RR; 28% v 15.5%; P = .0009) and time to progression (TTP; 6.2 v 4.4 months; P = .0009) were significantly superior with FOLFOX4. In the nonrandom subset of patients who crossed over, RR and TTP improvements with FOLFOX4 continued into third-line treatment. Irinotecan therapy was associated with more grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and febrile neutropenia; FOLFOX4 was associated with more neutropenia and paresthesias. CONCLUSION: In patients who experienced treatment failure with front-line FU therapy, OS does not significantly differ whether second-line therapy begins with irinotecan or FOLFOX4. FOLFOX4 produces higher RR and longer TTP. Both arms had notable OS in patients who experienced treatment failure with first-line FU therapy.
机译:目的:该多中心III期试验的主要目标是确定用二线输注氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX4; B组)治疗时,难治性氟尿嘧啶(FU)患者的总生存(OS)是否不劣于伊立替康(A臂)。强制过渡到疾病进展的其他治疗方法。患者和方法:因转移性疾病或在辅助FU治疗后6个月内因转移性疾病或辅助FU治疗在6个月内未接受伊立替康或奥沙利铂治疗的患者,被随机分配至A组(伊立替康350或300 mg / m(2)每3周一次)或B组(FOLFOX4)。结果:总共491例患者被随机分配(A组,n = 245; B组,n = 246); 288名(59%)的FU治疗转移性结直肠癌失败。 277名患者(46%)接受了方案规定的三线治疗(A组为43%; B组为57%)。初始用FOLFOX4治疗的中位生存期为13.8个月(95%CI,12.2至15.0个月),伊立替康的中位生存期为14.3个月(95%CI,12.0至15.9个月)(P = 0.38;危险比= 0.92; 95%CI, 0.8至1.1)。 FOLFOX4的缓解率(RR; 28%对15.5%; P = .0009)和进展时间(TTP; 6.2对4.4个月; P = .0009)显着优于FOLFOX4。在交叉的非随机患者亚组中,FOLFOX4使RR和TTP改善继续进入三线治疗。伊立替康治疗与3级恶心,呕吐,腹泻和发热性中性粒细胞减少症相关; FOLFOX4与更多的中性粒细胞减少和感觉异常有关。结论:在一线FU治疗失败的患者中,无论二线治疗从伊立替康还是FOLFOX4开始,OS均无显着差异。 FOLFOX4产生更高的RR和更长的TTP。在接受一线FU治疗失败的患者中,两个手臂的OS均显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号