...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Climate >Atmospheric moisture transports from ocean to land and global energy flows in reanalyses.
【24h】

Atmospheric moisture transports from ocean to land and global energy flows in reanalyses.

机译:大气水分从海洋到陆地的运输以及全球能源流的重新分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

An assessment is made of the global energy and hydrological cycles from eight current atmospheric reanalyses and their depiction of changes over time. A brief evaluation of the water and energy cycles in the latest version of the NCAR climate model referred to as CCSM4 is also given. The focus is on the mean ocean, land, and global precipitation P; the corresponding evaporation E; their difference corresponding to the surface freshwater flux E-P; and the vertically integrated atmospheric moisture transports. Using the model-based P and E, the time- and area-average E-P for the oceans, P-E for land, and the moisture transport from ocean to land should all be identical but are not close in most reanalyses, and often differ significantly from observational estimates of the surface return flow based on net river discharge into the oceans. Their differences reveal outstanding issues with atmospheric models and their biases, which are manifested as analysis increments in the reanalyses. The NCAR CCSM4, along with most reanalysis models, the exception being MERRA, has too-intense water cycling (P and E) over the ocean although ocean-to-land transports are very close to observed. Precipitation from reanalyses that assimilate moisture from satellite observations exhibits large changes identified with the changes in the observing system, as new and improved temperature and water vapor channels are assimilated and, while P improves after about 2002, E-P does not. Discrepancies among hydrological cycle components arise from analysis increments that can add or subtract moisture. The large-scale moisture budget divergences are more stable in time and similar across reanalyses than model-based estimates of E-P. Results are consistent with the view that recycling of moisture is too large in most models and the lifetime of moisture is too short. For the energy cycle, most reanalyses have spurious imbalances of ~10 W m-2 within the atmosphere, and ~5-10 W m-2 in net fluxes into the surface and to space. Major improvements are needed in model treatment and assimilation of moisture, and surface fluxes from reanalyses should only be used with great caution.
机译:通过对当前八次大气再分析的全球能源和水文循环及其随时间变化的描述进行评估。还简要介绍了最新版本的NCAR气候模型CCSM4中的水和能源循环。重点是平均海洋,陆地和全球降水量 P ;相应的蒸发 E ;它们的差对应于表面淡水通量 E-P ;垂直整合的大气水分传输。使用基于模型的 P 和 E ,得出海洋 PE 的时间和面积平均 EP 对于陆地而言,从海洋到陆地的水分传输应该全部相同,但在大多数再分析中都不是很接近,并且通常与基于河流净流入海洋的地表回流的观测估计值有显着差异。它们的差异揭示了大气模型及其偏差的突出问题,这在重新分析中表现为分析增量。 NCAR CCSM4以及大多数再分析模型(MERRA除外)在海洋上具有过分强烈的水循环( P 和 E )非常接近观察到。重新分析的降水吸收了卫星观测中的水分,显示出与观测系统变化相一致的大变化,因为新的和改进的温度和水汽通道被吸收了,而 P 大约在2002年以后有所改善, EP 不会。水文循环成分之间的差异是由于可以增加或减少水分的分析增量引起的。与基于模型的 P 估计相比,大规模的水分收支差异在时间上更稳定并且在重新分析中相似。结果与以下观点一致:大多数模型中水分的回收量太大,水分的寿命太短。对于能量循环,大多数重新分析的虚假失衡在大气层内约为〜10 W m -2 ,而在进入地面的净通量中约为〜5-10 W m -2 和空间。在模型处理和水分吸收方面需要进行重大改进,重新分析产生的表面通量应非常谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号