...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomedical informatics. >Information system design for a hospital emergency department: a usability analysis of software prototypes.
【24h】

Information system design for a hospital emergency department: a usability analysis of software prototypes.

机译:医院急诊科信息系统设计:软件原型的可用性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usability of emergency department (ED) software prototypes developed for Tablet personal computers (Tablet PCs) in order to keep electronic health records (EHRs) of patients errorless and accessible through mobile technologies. In order to serve this purpose, two alternative prototypes were developed for Tablet PCs: Mobile Emergency Department Software (MEDS) and Mobile Emergency Department Software Iconic (MEDSI) among which the user might choose the more appropriate one for ED operations based on a usability analysis involving the target users. METHODS: The study is based on a case study of 32 potential users of our prototypes at the ED of Kadikoy-AHG in Istanbul, Turkey. We examined usability of the prototypes for medical information systems by means of Nielsen's heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough methods relying on 7-point scales, and scenario completion success rate and average scenario completion time, respectively. RESULTS: The implementation of MEDSI in our case study confirmed the view that the usability evaluation results of iconic GUIs were better than those of non-iconic GUIs in terms of Nielsen's heuristic evaluation, effectiveness and user satisfaction. For the whole sample, paired t-test scores indicated that there was a significant difference (p<0.01) between mean values of Nielsen's usability scores toward MEDS and MEDSI indicating that MEDSI was evaluated more favorably than MEDS. As for effectiveness of the prototypes, significant differences (p<0.01) were noted between MEDS and MEDSI in terms of both overall scenario completion success rate and average scenario completion time. Similarly, for the full sample of users independent sample t-test scores indicated that MEDSI was perceived significantly more favorable (p<0.01) than MEDS in terms of overall user satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The study provides two important contributions to the extant literature. First, it addresses a topic and methodology that serves potentially interesting to the biomedical informatics community. Drawing on good background information and appropriate context, it involves various aspects of usability testing. Another contribution of the study lies in its examination of two different prototypes during the design phase involving the target users.
机译:研究目的:这项研究的目的是评估为平板电脑(Tablet PC)开发的急诊科(ED)软件原型的可用性,以保持患者的电子健康记录(EHR)无误且可通过移动技术访问。为了达到这个目的,为平板电脑开发了两种替代的原型:移动紧急部门软件(MEDS)和移动紧急部门软件标志性(MEDSI),用户可以根据可用性分析选择更合适的一种进行ED操作涉及目标用户。方法:该研究基于对我们的原型的32位潜在用户的案例研究,该原型在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的Kadikoy-AHG急诊室进行。我们通过尼尔森的启发式评估和依靠7点量表的认知演练方法以及方案完成成功率和平均方案完成时间分别检查了医疗信息系统原型的可用性。结果:在我们的案例研究中MEDSI的实施证实了以下观点:就Nielsen的启发式评估,有效性和用户满意度而言,标志性GUI的可用性评估结果优于非标志性GUI。对于整个样本,成对的t检验得分表明,尼尔森针对MEDS和MEDSI的可用性得分的平均值之间存在显着差异(p <0.01),表明MEDSI的评价比MEDS更好。至于原型的有效性,在总体方案完成成功率和平均方案完成时间方面,MEDS和MEDSI之间存在显着差异(p <0.01)。类似地,对于全部用户样本,独立样本t检验得分表明,就整体用户满意度而言,MEDSI被认为比MEDS明显更有利(p <0.01)。结论:该研究为现有文献提供了两个重要贡献。首先,它讨论了一个可能对生物医学信息学界感兴趣的主题和方法。利用良好的背景信息和适当的上下文,它涉及可用性测试的各个方面。该研究的另一个贡献在于,在设计阶段涉及目标用户的两个不同原型的检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号