Range of normality versus range of motion: A functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury.

Gracovetsky SA

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >Range of normality versus range of motion: A functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury.

【24h】

Range of normality versus range of motion: A functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury.

机译：正常范围与运动范围：预防和管理下背痛的功能性措施。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The Range of Motion (ROM) is a popular measurement used in the determination of disability for low back pain subjects in spite of serious objections to its clinical usefulness. It is proposed to consider a different index called the Range of Normality (RON) which is defined to be the portion of the ROM that an injured subject is able to do quasi-normally. This permits a direct assessment of the return to work parameters and the restrictions that ought to be placed on activities. It also allows follow up since the RON is expected to fill up the ROM as the injured subject recovers from his injury.

机译：运动范围（ROM）是一种流行的测量方法，尽管严重反对其临床实用性，但仍用于确定下背痛患者的残疾程度。建议考虑一种称为正常范围（RON）的不同索引，该索引定义为ROM受伤对象能够正常进行的部分。这样就可以直接评估恢复工作参数以及应该对活动施加的限制。由于受伤的对象从受伤中恢复后，RON有望填满ROM，因此还可以进行后续操作。

著录项

来源
《Journal of bodywork and movement therapies》 |2010年第1期|共10页
作者
Gracovetsky SA;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类康复医学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Range of normality versus range of motion: A functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury. [J] . Gracovetsky SA Journal of bodywork and movement therapies . 2010,第1期

机译：正常范围与运动范围：预防和管理下背痛的功能性措施。
2. Measuring Range of Motion and Muscle Activation of Flower Arrangement Tasks and Application for Improving Upper Limb Function [J] . Son-Sun Lee, Sin-Ae Park, Oh-Yun Kwon, Korean Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology . 2012,第4期

机译：插花任务的运动和肌肉激活的测量范围及其在上肢功能改善中的应用
3. Effect of intrathecal baclofen bolus injection on lower extremity joint range of motion during gait in patients with acquired brain injury. [J] . Horn TS, Yablon SA, Chow JW, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . 2010,第1期

机译：鞘内巴氯芬推注对获得性脑损伤患者步态下肢关节活动范围的影响。
4. A low cost method to measure finger flexion in individuals with reduced hand and finger range of motion [C] . Simone L.K., Elovic E., Kalambur U., Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS '04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE . -1

机译：一种测量手和手指运动范围减小的个体中手指弯曲的低成本方法
5. Measuring preferred trading ranges and liquidity to test preferred trading range theory. [D] . Grenci, Anthony Frank. 2003

机译：测量优先交易范围和流动性以测试优先交易范围理论。
6. Association of wrist and forearm range of motion measures with self-reported functional scores amongst patients with distal radius fractures: a longitudinal study [O] . Zixian Yang, Peggy Poh Hoon Lim, Sing Hwee Teo, 2018

机译：distal骨远端骨折患者手腕和前臂运动范围与自我报告的功能评分的关联：一项纵向研究
7. : "This paper deals with the functionality of the flaked stone assemblages from several Neolithic sites of the NE of the Iberian Peninsula. The chronological framework ranges from the mid-6th to the mid-4th millennium cal. BCE, which corresponds to the Early and Middle Neolithic. This long period ranges from the arrival of the first farming communities in the Iberian Peninsula, around 5600-5500 cal. BCE, to 3600-3500 cal. BCE, two millennia later, when Neolithic communities had stably occupied most of the available territory, from the mountainous areas of the Pyrenees to the coastal areas of the Mediterranean.In this context, the NE of the Iberian Peninsula is one of the areas where a major number of use-wear analyses have been carried out, especially for what concerns the Neolithic period. This is mainly due to the interest shown by the directors of the excavations and by the Spanish use-wear specialists as well; both participated and cooperated in order to enlarge the number of contexts studied, making the NE of the Iberian Peninsula one of the areas of Europe with the largest number of ‘functional studies’. As a result, today we have a reliable picture of the type of lithic tools used by the first farming groups, how they were used, and which needs they were satisfying.The methodology employed for this type of analysis is today broadly shared by most use-wear specialists. A stereoscopic microscope is used together with a reflected-light microscope for the analysis of the archaeological specimens. Afterwards, the observed use-wear traces are compared with the traces from experimental tools. This study primarily made use of the tools preserved at the ‘Traceoteque’ of the Institución Milà y Fontanals of the CSIC of Barcelona.This paper presents the results obtained for the different types of analysed sites and the relative lithic assemblages. In this way, tools from different contexts are compared: open-air sites, caves and rock-shelters, pit-sites, burials, and mining sites. Such a diversity of contexts allowed for the exploration of the existence of recurrences and differences in the functionality of the lithic tools from one site to another. The results obtained have also provided information on some aspects related to the economic processes carried out at the different sites, caves, rock-shelters and open-air contexts. It has been possible to gain fresh data on the types of tasks carried out and their relative importance for each site, their relation with the geographical and environmental context and the natural resources available there. In addition, analysing tools recovered from burials – mainly individual inhumations – provided information on the relationships between the buried individuals and the working tools, in particular exploring the relationships between sex and age patterns and the types of tools deposited as goods.In conclusion, use-wear analysis allowed for the exploration of a variety of issues; from technical aspects related to the production and management of the lithic resources to social aspects related to the subsistence activities and the individuals that carried them out." [O] . Gibaja Bao, Juan Francisco, Mazzucco, Niccolo 2015

机译：：“本文研究了伊比利亚半岛东北部几个新石器时代遗址的片状石材组合的功能。时间框架从公元前6世纪中叶到4世纪中叶，分别对应于早期和早期。新石器时代中期，这段时间的长短是从伊比利亚半岛的第一个农业社区到来，大约在公元前5600-5500 cal，到了两千年后的3600-3500 BCE，当时新石器时代的社区稳定地占据了大部分可用土地。从比利牛斯山脉山区到地中海沿岸地区。在这种情况下，伊比利亚半岛东北部是进行过大量使用磨损分析的地区之一，尤其是在关注方面新石器时代，这主要是由于发掘负责人和西班牙使用服装专家表现出的浓厚兴趣；他们参与和合作以扩大孔蒂的数量xts进行了研究，使伊比利亚半岛的NE成为“功能研究”数量最多的欧洲地区之一。结果，今天我们可以可靠地了解第一批耕作小组使用的石器工具的类型，使用方法以及它们满足的需求。今天，大多数使用方法广泛共享用于这种类型的分析的方法穿专家。立体显微镜与反射光显微镜一起用于分析考古样本。然后，将观察到的使用磨损痕迹与实验工具的痕迹进行比较。这项研究主要利用了巴塞罗那CSIC的米拉·丰塔纳尔研究所的“ Traceoteque”中保存的工具。本文介绍了针对不同类型的分析地点和相对石器组合所获得的结果。通过这种方式，可以比较来自不同环境的工具：露天场所，洞穴和岩石避难所，露天场所，埋葬场所和采矿场所。如此多样的上下文允许探索重复性的存在以及从一个站点到另一个站点的石器工具的功能差异。所获得的结果还提供了与在不同地点，洞穴，避难所和露天环境中进行的经济过程有关的某些方面的信息。可以获得有关所执行任务的类型及其对每个站点的相对重要性，它们与地理和环境环境以及那里可用自然资源的关系的新数据。此外，对从墓葬中回收的工具（主要是个人遗体）进行分析，可提供有关被掩埋的个体与工作工具之间关系的信息，尤其是探索性别与年龄模式之间的关系以及作为商品存放的工具的类型。磨损分析允许探索各种问题；从与石器资源的生产和管理有关的技术方面到与自给活动及其实施者有关的社会方面。”
8. Health Hazard Evaluation and Technical Assistance Report No. TA 78-22, U.S. Postal Service Indoor Firing Ranges Management Sectional Center, Merrifield, Virginia: A Study of the Effectiveness of Copper Jacketed Ammunition in Lowering Lead Exposures in Indoor Firing Ranges [R] . Kronoveter, K. J. 1978

机译：健康危害评估和技术援助报告No. Ta 78-22，弗吉尼亚州梅里菲尔德美国邮政服务室内射击场管理分区中心：铜夹套弹药降低室内射击场铅暴露的有效性研究

Range of normality versus range of motion: A functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅