...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Enrolling adolescents in asthma research: adolescent, parent, and physician influence in the decision-making process.
【24h】

Enrolling adolescents in asthma research: adolescent, parent, and physician influence in the decision-making process.

机译:让青少年参与哮喘研究:青少年,父母和医生在决策过程中的影响力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The factors influencing family decisions to participate in adolescent asthma research are not well understood. Legal and ethical imperatives require adolescent research participation to be voluntary. While parents and adolescents often agree about research decisions, disagreements may also occur with relative frequency. Physician recommendations are also known to influence research participation decisions. Little attention has been given to how these dynamics may affect adolescents' involvement in decisions to participate in research. OBJECTIVE :To examine the influence of family and physician-investigator relationships and recommendations on adolescent asthma clinical research participation decisions. METHODS: A statewide community sample of 111 adolescents 11 to 17 years of age, with a diagnosis of asthma, and their parents participated in this study. Adolescents received a medical evaluation from an asthma specialist and then the family was offered participation in a hypothetical asthma clinical trial. By random assignment, the research study was presented by either the same or an unknown asthma specialist, and half the families in each group also received affirmative recommendations from the asthma specialist to participate in the hypothetical asthma clinical trial. Parents and adolescents made initial private decisions about participating in the trial. Then, following a family discussion of the clinical trial, a final research participation decision was made. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of parents and adolescents initially disagreed about the research participation decision. When disagreements occurred, final decisions followed the parents' initial views except when the physician-investigator was known and a recommendation was made. Families with initial disagreement about participating were less likely to enroll when the investigator was unknown or when no recommendation was made. Adolescents who initially disagreed with parents' views were less likely to concur with the final research participation decision, felt less comfortable, and were less likely to feel they influenced the decision. CONCLUSIONS: Parents' views on research decisions take precedence over adolescents' views in most circumstances. Physician-investigator relationships may reduce parental resistance to participation and enhance adolescent decision-making autonomy when research participation is desired by the adolescent.
机译:背景:影响家庭决策参与青少年哮喘研究的因素尚不十分清楚。法律和道德上的必要性要求青少年参与研究是自愿的。尽管父母和青少年经常就研究决定达成共识,但也可能相对频繁地出现分歧。还已知医师的建议会影响研究参与决策。这些动态如何影响青少年参与研究决策的关注很少。目的:研究家庭和医师-研究者的关系和建议对青少年哮喘临床研究参与决策的影响。方法:在全州范围内对111名11至17岁的青少年进行了社区诊断,并诊断为哮喘,他们的父母参加了这项研究。青少年从哮喘专家那里接受了医学评估,然后让该家庭参与了一项假设的哮喘临床试验。通过随机分配,由相同或未知的哮喘专科医生进行研究研究,每组中的一半家庭还收到了哮喘专科医生的肯定性建议,以参加假设的哮喘临床试验。父母和青少年对参加试验做出了最初的私人决定。然后,在对临床试验进行家庭讨论后,做出了最终的研究参与决策。结果:33%的父母和青少年最初不同意研究参与的决定。当发生分歧时,最终决定将遵循父母的最初观点,除非认识医师研究人员并提出建议。在调查人员不知名或未提出建议的情况下,最初对参与度存有异议的家庭不太可能注册。最初不同意父母观点的青少年不太可能同意最终的研究参与决定,感到不舒服,也不太可能感觉到他们对决定的影响。结论:在大多数情况下,父母对研究决定的观点优先于青少年的观点。当青少年需要研究参与时,医师与研究者的关系可能会降低父母对参与的抵抗力,并增强青少年的决策自主权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号