...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian Economics >How did Korean households cope with negative shocks from the financial crisis?
【24h】

How did Korean households cope with negative shocks from the financial crisis?

机译:韩国家庭如何应对金融危机带来的负面冲击?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper employs a panel of household data from Korea to examine how households coped with the shortfall in consumption during 1994-1998, which encompasses the financial crisis of 1997. We adopt the econometric framework from Glewwe and Hall [Glewwe, P., & Hall, G. (1998). Are some groups more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks than others? Hypothesis tests based on panel data from Peru.f Journal of Development Economics, 56, 181 -206] and estimate a household consumption growth equation. We find that larger households tend to be protected to a greater extent from shortfall in consumption, and that the vulnerability of female-headed households is not greater than that of male-headed households. Among the coping strategies, private transfers act both as an ex-ante risk-managing device and an ex-post coping mechanism. Urban households and those headed by the self-employed experienced a larger shortfall in consumption during the crisis. While credit was used to smooth consumption of children's education, medical and childcare services during the pre-crisis years, it was not utilized as a coping strategy during the 1997 crisis, possibly due to the credit crunch caused by stringent monetary policies. Instead, households cut back consumption of luxurious and durable goods to preserve food consumption and spending on children's education. We do not find evidence of households liquidating their assets to cushion the shortfall in consumption, during the 1997 crisis. It is possible that they did not liquidate their assets because land and stock prices declined significantly.
机译:本文采用了韩国家庭数据小组的数据,研究了家庭如何应对1994-1998年期间的消费不足,其中包括1997年的金融危机。我们采用了Glewwe和Hall的计量经济学框架[Glewwe,P.,&Hall ,G。(1998)。有些团体是否比其他团体更容易受到宏观经济冲击的影响?假设检验基于来自秘鲁的面板数据[f,发展经济学杂志,56,181 -206],并估计家庭消费增长方程。我们发现,较大的家庭倾向于受到更大程度的保护,免受消费不足的影响,而以女性为户主的家庭的脆弱性不大于以男性为户主的家庭的脆弱性。在应对策略中,私人转移既可以作为事前风险管理手段,也可以作为事后应对机制。在危机期间,城市家庭和以个体户为首的家庭的消费缺口更大。尽管在危机前的几年里,信贷被用来使儿童的教育,医疗和育儿服务的消费平稳,但在1997年的危机中,信贷却没有被用作应对策略,这可能是由于严格的货币政策造成的信贷紧缩。取而代之的是,家庭减少了奢侈品和耐用商品的消费,以保持食品消费和儿童教育支出。我们没有找到证据证明在1997年的危机期间,家庭会清算资产以缓解消费短缺。由于土地和股票价格大幅下跌,他们可能没有清算资产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号