首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian Economics >APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism/Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security/Asian Economic Recovery: Policy Options for Growth and Stability/Macroeconomics for Business and Society: A Developed/Developing Countr
【24h】

APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism/Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security/Asian Economic Recovery: Policy Options for Growth and Stability/Macroeconomics for Business and Society: A Developed/Developing Countr

机译:亚太经合组织与环太平洋地区主义的建立/亚太战略关系:寻求融合的安全性/亚洲经济复苏:增长与稳定的政策选择/商业和社会的宏观经济:发达/发展中的国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

These four books bring a range of perspectives to the future of Asian economies; indeed, two (Ravenhill and Tow) belong to the literature of international relations rather than economics, and one (Adams) is a textbook in macroeconomic theory whose examples and applications rely heavily on recent Asian experience. The fourth (Tan) is a conference volume, the bulk of it pursuing the now familiar debate about the sources of and appropriate responses to the 1997-1998 financial and economic crisis, particularly the role of IMF-recommended policies. Tow's Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations is an overview of regional security issues. It uses a framework of "realist" (positing an anarchical international environment in which states primarily seek to maximize political power) versus "liberal" (emphasizing the utility of international regimes or institutions that encourage states to cooperate and seek positive-sum economic gains) approaches, to delineate the past and present security policies of the region's main actors. Five separate sections treat China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan (as key secondary players), ASEAN and Australia (as the players potentially most interested in a "liberal" and regional orientation), and the United States. The author's conclusion is that existing "realist" or "liberal" approaches alone may exacerbate, rather than help solve, international disputes and security dilemmas and need to be replaced by an integrated approach - which he calls "convergent security"-in which hegemonic or balancing strategies using bilateral arrangements can gradually be replaced by a process of building effective multilateral institutions. The book is readable, and provides a valuable, thorough discussion in context of the security postures of each side. Completed in the early days of the George W. Bush Administration, it inevitably offers only the most general comments on the new direction of US policy, and none on post-September 11. This may not be a disadvantage, however, since it will be some time before these can be reasonably assessed (certainly the posited contrast of Bush "realism" with Clinton "Wilsonian"-ism no longer seems complete) and in the mean time the beginning of 2001 remains an appropriate point of departure. This book will be welcomed by scholars or students looking for a balanced introduction to the subject.
机译:这四本书为亚洲经济的未来带来了一系列观点。的确,有两本书(拉文希尔和托夫)属于国际关系的文学著作,而不是经济学书籍,而一本书(亚当斯)是宏观经济学理论的教科书,其实例和应用在很大程度上取决于亚洲的最新经验。第四(Tan)是一本会议卷,其大部分内容围绕着人们熟悉的关于1997-1998年金融和经济危机的来源和对策的辩论,尤其是基金组织推荐政策的作用。 Tow的《亚太战略关系》概述了区域安全问题。它使用“现实主义”(假设国家主要寻求最大程度地发挥政治权力的无政府状态的国际环境)与“自由主义”(强调鼓励国家合作并寻求正和经济收益的国际制度或制度的效用)的框架方法,勾勒出该地区主要角色过去和现在的安全政策。五个单独的部分分别处理了中国,日本,韩国和台湾(作为主要的次要参与者),东盟和澳大利亚(作为对“自由主义”和地区取向可能最感兴趣的参与者)和美国。作者的结论是,仅现有的“现实主义”或“自由主义”方法可能会加剧而不是帮助解决国际争端和安全困境,因此需要以一种综合方法代替,他称之为“融合安全”,在这种方法中霸权主义或采用双边安排的平衡战略可以逐步被建立有效的多边机构的过程所取代。这本书可读性强,并就每一方的安全态势提供了宝贵而透彻的讨论。它在乔治·W·布什(George W. Bush)政权成立初期完成,不可避免地仅对美国政策的新方向提供了最笼统的评论,而对9月11日后的评论则无人评论。但这可能不是不利的,因为它将在可以合理地评估这些结论之前的一段时间(肯定是布什的“现实主义”与克林顿的“威尔逊主义”的假定对比似乎不再完整),与此同时,2001年初仍然是一个适当的出发点。寻求平衡地介绍该主题的学者或学生将欢迎这本书。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号