首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >A comparison of chemical and petrographic analyses of Neolithic pottery from South-eastern Europe
【24h】

A comparison of chemical and petrographic analyses of Neolithic pottery from South-eastern Europe

机译:东南欧新石器时代陶器的化学和岩石学分析比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper deals with the importance of chemical analyses in characterising prehistoric pottery fabrics. Two three-year projects focussed on the minero-petrographic and SEM/EDS analyses of the oldest pottery from south-east Europe (ca. 6000 cal BC). Whereas in the Impressed Ware culture of the Adriatic region, optical microscopy was sufficient to identify provenance, the more uniform geological back-ground of the central Balkans required chemical analyses to be able to differentiate between different raw materials. Multiple bulk analyses of each sherd were obtained to gauge the variability in composition within each vessel. The limiting factor in determining provenance in this area appears to be the similarity of clay sources, not the inhomogeneity of the coarse pottery. This is shown here using results from four of the sites, including three where petrographic analyses could not establish provenance.
机译:本文论述了化学分析在表征史前陶器织物中的重要性。两个为期三年的项目着重于东南欧(约公元前6000 cal)的最古老陶器的矿物岩石学和SEM / EDS分析。在亚得里亚海地区的印象深刻的文化中,光学显微镜足以识别出处,而巴尔干中部的地质背景更为统一,则需要进行化学分析以区分不同的原材料。获得了对每个片的多次散装分析,以测量每个容器内成分的变异性。确定该地区物源的限制因素似乎是黏土来源的相似性,而不是粗陶的不均匀性。这里使用四个站点的结果进行了显示,其中三个站点的岩相分析无法确定出处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号