首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging and physical activity >Validity of the step test for exercise prescription: No extension to a larger age range
【24h】

Validity of the step test for exercise prescription: No extension to a larger age range

机译:运动处方阶梯测试的有效性:不能扩展到更大的年龄范围

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of a submaximal exercise test, the Step Test Exercise Prescription (STEP), in a broad age range and in individuals in the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Individuals (n = 102) underwent treadmill-based maximal exercise testing and a STEP. The STEP failed to predict peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), and was a biased estimate of VO2peak (p .0001). Only 43% of subjects' STEP results were within 3.5 ml · kg-1 · min-1 of VO2peak. When categorized into fitness levels these 2 measures demonstrated moderate agreement (kappa =.59). The validity of the STEP was not supported in our participants, including those with AD. The STEP may not be appropriate in the clinic as a basis for exercise recommendations in these groups, although it may continue to have utility in classifying fitness in research or community health screenings.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定次最大运动测试,逐步测试运动处方(STEP)在广泛的年龄范围内以及阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)早期阶段的个体中的有效性。个人(n = 102)进行了基于跑步机的最大运动测试和STEP。 STEP无法预测峰值耗氧量(VO2peak),并且是VO2peak的有偏估计(p <.0001)。受试者的STEP结果中只有43%处于VO2peak的3.5 ml·kg-1·min-1之内。当归类为健康水平时,这两项措施显示出适度的一致性(kappa = .59)。我们的参与者(包括患有AD的参与者)均不支持STEP的有效性。尽管STEP可能继续在研究或社区健康筛查中对健身进行分类,但它可能不适合在临床中作为这些人群进行运动建议的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号