...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >Electroacupuncture modulates vlPAG release of GABA through presynaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors.
【24h】

Electroacupuncture modulates vlPAG release of GABA through presynaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

机译:电针通过突触前大麻素CB1受体调节vlPAG释放GABA。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies have demonstrated that electroacupuncture (EA) attenuates sympathoexcitatory reflex responses by activating a long-loop pathway involving the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARC), midbrain ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), and rostral ventrolateral medulla (rVLM). Neurons in the ARC provide excitatory input to the vlPAG, whereas the vlPAG inhibits neuronal activity in the rVLM. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (Glu) have been identified in the vlPAG. Endocannabinoids (ECs), acting as atypical neurotransmitters, inhibit the release of both neurotransmitters in the hypothalamus and midbrain through a presynaptic cannabinoid type 1 (CB(1)) receptor mechanism. The EC system has been observed in the dorsal but not in the vlPAG. Since it is uncertain whether ECs influence GABA and Glu in the vlPAG, the present study tested the hypothesis that EA modulates the release of these neurotransmitters in the vlPAG through a presynaptic CB(1) receptor mechanism. We measured the release of GABA and Glu simultaneously by using HPLC to assess samples collected with microdialysis probes inserted unilaterally into the vlPAG of intact anesthetized rats. Twenty-eight min of EA (2 Hz, 2-4 mA, 0.5 ms) at the P5-6 acupoints reduced the release of GABA by 39% during EA and by 44% 15 min after EA. Thirty-five minutes after EA, GABA concentrations returned to pre-EA levels. In contrast, sham EA did not change the vlPAG GABA concentration. Blockade of CB(1) receptors with AM251, a selective CB(1) receptor antagonist, reversed the EA-modulated changes in GABA concentration, whereas microinjection of vehicle into the vlPAG did not alter EA-modulated GABA changes. In addition, we observed no changes in the vlPAG Glu concentrations during EA, although the baseline concentration of Glu was much higher than that of GABA (3,541 +/- 373 vs. 33.8 +/- 8.7 nM, Glu vs. GABA). These results suggest that EA modulates the sympathoexcitatory reflex responses by decreasing the release of GABA, but not Glu, in the vlPAG, most likely through a presynaptic CB(1) receptor mechanism.
机译:先前的研究表明,电针(EA)通过激活涉及下丘脑弓状核(ARC),中脑腹侧腹旁导水管灰质(vlPAG)和头侧腹侧延髓(rVLM)的长环通路来减弱交感兴奋反射反应。 ARC中的神经元向vlPAG提供兴奋性输入,而vlPAG抑制rVLM中的神经元活性。 vlPAG中已鉴定出γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)和谷氨酸(Glu)。内源性大麻素(EC),作为非典型的神经递质,通过突触前大麻素1型(CB(1))受体机制抑制下丘脑和中脑中两种神经递质的释放。已在背侧观察到EC系统,但在vPAG中未观察到。由于尚不确定EC是否会影响vlPAG中的GABA和Glu,因此本研究检验了EA通过突触前CB(1)受体机制调节vlPAG中这些神经递质释放的假设。我们通过使用HPLC来评估GABA和Glu的释放,方法是使用HPLC评估用单侧插入完整麻醉大鼠的vPAG中的微透析探针收集的样品。在P5-6穴位处的二十八分钟EA(2 Hz,2-4 mA,0.5 ms)使EA期间GABA的释放减少了39%,而EA后15分钟减少了44%。 EA后三十五分钟,GABA浓度恢复到EA前水平。相反,深部EA并没有改变vlPAG GABA浓度。用选择性CB(1)受体拮抗剂AM251阻断CB(1)受体可逆转EA调节的GABA浓度变化,而向vlPAG中微量注入溶媒则不会改变EA调节的GABA改变。此外,尽管EA的vluPAG Glu浓度比GABA的基线浓度高得多(3,541 +/- 373 vs. 33.8 +/- 8.7 nM,Glu vs. GABA),但在EA期间vlPAG Glu浓度没有变化。这些结果表明,EA通过减少vlPAG中GABA的释放而不是Glu的释放来调节交感兴奋反射反应,这很可能是通过突触前CB(1)受体机制实现的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号