首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Aquaculture >A Comparison of Two Feeding Technologies in Freshwater Prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, Raised at High Biomass Densities in Temperate Ponds
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Feeding Technologies in Freshwater Prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, Raised at High Biomass Densities in Temperate Ponds

机译:温水池塘高生物量饲养淡水虾罗氏沼虾两种饲养技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent developments in prawn production technologies (i.e., added substrate, increased stocking densities, size grading, and increased feed rates) have increased production rales from 900-1,000 kg/ha to over 2,500 kg/ha. While prawn can receive substantial nutritional benefit from natural foods at the lower biomass densities, at higher production rates prawn are likely to be more dependent on prepared diets. To ensure that maximum production is being achieved by these new production technologies, production rates must not be nutritionally constrained. This study was conducted to compare the current recommended technology of phase feeding of different quality feedstuff's to prawns of different sizes with the feeding of a high-quality penaeid diet throughout the production season. Two treatments were evaluated: Treatment I was phase feeding (current technology-control) where prawns were fed un-pelleted distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) for the first four weeks, then a 28%-protein prawn diet forweeks 5-12, and finally a 40%-protein pcnaeid diet for weeks 13-16. In Treatment 2, prawn were fed the 40%-protein penaeid diet throughout the entire production period. Feeding rates in both treatments were based upon a feeding table. Three 0.04 ha ponds were used for each treatment. All ponds were slocked at 59,280 juvenilcs/ha and were provided with artificial substrate in the form of a polyethylene "safely fence" oriented vertically to increase available surface area by 50%. After 106 culture days,no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between treatments in terms of yield, average individual weight, food conversion ratio (FCR). or survival, which averaged 2,575 kg/ha, 46 g, 2.3, and 94%, respectively, overall. Due to the higher cosl of the penaeid diet (US0.84 dollar/kg), feeding costs for the penaeid diet treatment (Treatment 2) were 38% higher than those for Treatment 1. No benefit to using higher protein diets during the first 12 weeks of prawn pond production was observed.
机译:对虾生产技术的最新发展(即增加底物,增加放养密度,规格分级和提高进料速度)使生产规则从900-1,000公斤/公顷增加到2500公斤/公顷以上。虽然虾在较低的生物量密度下可以从天然食物中获得大量的营养益处,但在更高的生产率下,虾可能更依赖于准备好的饮食。为了确保通过这些新的生产技术实现最大的产量,决不能在营养方面限制生产率。进行了这项研究,以比较当前推荐的将不同质量的饲料分阶段饲喂给不同大小的虾的技术,并在整个生产季节中饲喂高质量的对虾饲料。评估了两种处理方法:第一种处理方法是阶段饲喂(当前技术控制),在最初的四个星期中,将未球化的酒糟用可溶物(DDGS)饲喂大虾,然后在5-12周内饲喂28%蛋白质的大虾饲料,最后在13至16周内采用40%蛋白的pcnaeid饮食。在处理2中,在整个生产过程中,对虾均饲喂40%蛋白的对虾饲料。两种处理中的喂食速率均基于喂食表。每个处理使用三个0.04公顷的池塘。将所有池塘锁定为59,280尤文尼拉/公顷,并以垂直定向的聚乙烯“安全围栏”形式提供人造基质,以将可用表面积增加50%。培养106天后,在产量,平均个体重量,食物转化率(FCR)方面,各处理之间未观察到显着差异(P> 0.05)。或存活率,总体平均分别为2575公斤/公顷,46克,2.3和94%。由于对虾饮食的cosl较高(0.84美元/千克),对虾饮食治疗(治疗2)的饲料成本比治疗1高38%。在前12天使用高蛋白饮食无益观察到虾塘生产数周。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号