...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science and Technology >Effect of Solid Side Chute Design for Individual Handling of Hanwoo (Korean Cattle)
【24h】

Effect of Solid Side Chute Design for Individual Handling of Hanwoo (Korean Cattle)

机译:固体侧滑槽设计对Hanwoo(韩牛)个体处理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Moving behavior of groups of Hanwoo was observed when solid side was applied along the straight single file chute. Dark blue liners (PVC coated fabric) were hung on the outer side along the steel bars of chute to block vision of cattle. Ten animals were grouped together in a batch to move through chute to the restrainter. Movement of animals through chutes were significantly faster when solid side with liners were applied than when they had open vision of flight zone. And the difference in movement time between of solid side and open side was even greater in a longer chute than in a shorter one. From the experiment with longer chute, we could not find any significant differences between presence or absence of solid sides in the time spent for the leaading cattle to enter the squeeze chute from crowd pen. But the average time spent for movement from squeeze gait to restrainter was 22.78 ±1.15 seconds with solid sides, which was much shorter than with open sides (40.56 ± 4.46 seconds). Time required for batch of animals to move from crowd pen to restrainter and exit was much faster with solid sides than with open sides: 96.33 ± 3.98 seconds vs. 121.89 ±5.54 seconds from leading animal to enter the squeeze chute until the last animal of the batchto exit restrainter and 104.56 ±3.89 vs. 131.22 ±6.42 seconds for the whole batch of animals to enter the squeeze chute and exit restrainter. Another experiment with shorter chute showed that animals balked to right angled edge of the crowed pen before entering squeeze chute. We could not find any differences in time requred for the leading animal to enter the crowd pen from holding pen. Total time spent from entrance of leading animal to crowd pen until the last animal to exit restrainter was shorter with solid sides than with open sides: 177.44 ±5.20 seconds vs. 193.44 ±7.46 seconds.
机译:当沿直的单锉刀斜槽施加实心面时,观察到Hanwoo组的移动行为。深蓝色的衬里(涂有PVC的织物)沿着溜槽的钢条悬挂在外侧,以阻挡牛的视线。将十只动物分批分组,以通过溜槽到达约束器。当使用带衬里的坚固侧面时,动物通过溜槽的运动比其对飞行区域的视野开阔时要快得多。而且,较长的溜槽与较短的溜槽相比,实心侧和敞开侧之间的运动时间差异更大。从更长的溜槽进行的实验中,我们发现,在租出的牛从人群围栏进入挤压溜槽所花费的时间中,是否存在实心边之间没有任何显着差异。但是,从稳定步态到紧缩步态的平均运动时间为22.78±1.15秒,比敞开侧要短得多(40.56±4.46秒)。固态动物的侧面使批动物从人群围栏移动到约束器并退出所需要的时间要比开放侧面要快得多:96.33±3.98秒,而从引导动物进入挤压斜槽直到最后一只动物进入它的时间为121.89±5.54秒。批进入出口限制器,整个批次的动物进入挤压斜槽和出口限制器的时间分别为104.56±3.89和131.22±6.42秒。另一个使用更短的滑道的实验表明,动物在进入挤压滑道之前会与乌鸦笔的直角边缘接触。我们找不到领先的动物从候鸟栏进入人群围栏所需的时间差异。从领先动物进入拥挤围栏直到最后一只动物离开约束器所花费的总时间比实心侧要短于开放侧:177.44±5.20秒和193.44±7.46秒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号