...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Education >CREATIVE THINKING AND LEARNING STYLES IN UNDERGRADUATE AGRICULTURE STUDENTS
【24h】

CREATIVE THINKING AND LEARNING STYLES IN UNDERGRADUATE AGRICULTURE STUDENTS

机译:本科农科学生的创造性思维和学习风格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Creativity is multidimensional and still not completely understood by psychologists. Much research has given evidence that cognitive style of creative thinking is independent of cognitive level of creative thinking. However, is a student's learning style similar to their cognitive style of creative thinking? This study attempted to examine the presence or absence of relationships between student learning styles and student creative thinking. To determine this relationship the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking and the Gregorc Style Delineator were given to students enrolled in an oral communication course offered by the Department of Agricultural Education and Communication at the University of Florida. The researchers found no significant relationships between creative thinking ability and learning style, except for Abstract Random learners who scored lower in the creativity constructs of fluency and elaboration. Also, students scored high in the creative construct of elaboration with mean scoresin the 99th percentile and originality was the only creativity construct with mean scores below the 75th percentile. The results of this study indicate that more research is needed in the area of learning styles and creative thinking.
机译:创造力是多维的,心理学家仍未完全理解。大量研究表明,创造性思维的认知风格与创造性思维的认知水平无关。但是,学生的学习风格是否与他们的创造性思维的认知风格相似?这项研究试图检验学生学习风格与学生创造性思维之间关系的存在与否。为了确定这种关系,向参加佛罗里达大学农业教育与传播系提供的口头交流课程的学生提供了创造性思维的托兰斯测验和Gregorc Style Delineator。研究人员发现创造性思维能力与学习风格之间没有显着关系,除了抽象随机学习者在流利性和精心设计的创造性构想中得分较低。此外,学生在精心制作的创意构架中得分很高,平均得分在第99个百分点,而独创性是唯一的平均得分在第75个百分点以下的创意构架。这项研究的结果表明,在学习风格和创造性思维方面还需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号