...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Pietrain boars used on landrace sows for growth performance.
【24h】

Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Pietrain boars used on landrace sows for growth performance.

机译:利用测试站和农场数据对长白母猪使用的皮特兰公猪的生长性能进行遗传评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to develop a new genetic evaluation model to estimate the genetic merit of boars for growth based on (1) performance of their crossbred progeny fattened in the test station and (2) their own performance or those of relatives from the on-farm testing system. The model was a bivariate random regression animal model with linear splines and was applied to Pietrain boars from the Walloon Region of Belgium mated with Landrace sows. Data contained (1) 12,610 BW records from the test station collected on 1,435 crossbred pigs from Pietrain boars and Landrace sows, and (2) 52,993 BW records from the on-farm testing system collected on 50,670 pigs with a breed composition of at least 40% Pietrain or Landrace. Since 2007, 56 Pietrain boars have been tested in the station. Data used to estimate variance components and breeding values were standardized for the age to take into account heterogeneity of variances and then pre-adjusted at 210 d of age to put all records on the same scale. Body weight records from the test station and from the on-farm testing system were considered as 2 different traits. The heterosis effect was modeled as fixed regression on the heterozygosity coefficient. As all test station animals were similarly crossbred, smaller variation in heterozygosity caused the sampling error of the regression estimate at 210 d to be larger in the test station than in on-farm data with estimates of 28.35+or-14.55 kg and 9.02+or-0.67 kg, respectively. Therefore, the most likely reason for the large differences in estimates was sampling. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.37 to 0.60 at 210 and 75 d, respectively, for test station BW and from 0.42 to 0.60 at 210 d and 175 d, respectively, for on-farm BW. Genetic correlation decreased when the age interval between records increased, and were greater between ages for test station than for on-farm data. Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm BW at the same age were high: 0.90 at 175 d and 0.85 at 210 d. For the 56 boars tested in the station, the average reliability of their EBV for ADG between 100 and 210 d was improved from 0.60 using only test station data to 0.69 using jointly test station and on-farm data. Based on these results, the new model developed was considered as a good method of detection of differences in growth potential of Pietrain boars based on test station and on-farm data.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3816
机译:这项研究的目的是建立一个新的遗传评估模型,以评估公猪生长的遗传价值,其依据是:(1)在测试站中繁育的杂交后代的表现和(2)自己的表现或来自亲戚的表现。农场测试系统。该模型是带有线性样条的双变量随机回归动物模型,并应用于来自比利时瓦隆地区的皮特兰特公猪和长白母猪交配。数据包含(1)来自测试站的12,610 BW记录,收集自Pietrain公猪和长白母猪的1,435头杂种猪,以及(2)来自农场测试系统的52,993 BW记录,收集了50,670头品种组成至少为40头的猪%Pietrain或Landrace。自2007年以来,已在该站测试了56匹Pietrain公猪。考虑到方差的异质性,将用于估计方差成分和育种值的数据进行标准化,以考虑方差的异质性,然后在210 d年龄进行预先调整,以使所有记录处于相同规模。来自测试站和农场测试系统的体重记录被认为是两个不同的特征。将杂种优势效应建模为杂合性系数的固定回归。由于所有测试站的动物都相似地杂交,杂合度的较小变化导致测试站在210 d时回归估计的抽样误差比农场数据大,估计为28.35 +或-14.55 kg和9.02 +或分别为-0.67千克。因此,估计差异很大的最可能原因是抽样。对于测试站BW,遗传估计值分别在210和75 d范围内从0.37到0.60,对于农场BW分别在210 d和175 d范围上从0.42到0.60。当记录之间的年龄间隔增加时,遗传相关性降低,并且测试站的年龄之间的相关性大于农场数据。同一年龄的测试站和农场体重之间的遗传相关性很高:175天时为0.90,210天时为0.85。对于在该站中测试的56头公猪,在100到210 d之间,其ADV的EBV的平均可靠性从仅使用测试站数据的0.60提高到使用联合测试站和农场数据的0.69。基于这些结果,开发的新模型被认为是基于测试站和农场数据检测皮特兰公猪生长潜力差异的良好方法。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/ jas.2010-3816

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号