首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aerosol medicine: the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine >Aerodynamic Characteristics of Nebulized Terbutaline Sulphate Using the Next Generation Impactor (NGI) and CEN Method
【24h】

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Nebulized Terbutaline Sulphate Using the Next Generation Impactor (NGI) and CEN Method

机译:下一代撞击器(NGI)和CEN方法雾化的特布他林硫酸盐的空气动力学特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Characterization of the aerosolized dose emitted from a nebulized system can be determined using CEN (prEN13544-l) methodology and more recently with a Next Generation Impactor (NGI), but evaporative effects can influence the results. We have investigated these characteristics using different flows and cooling with the NGI and compared the results to the standard CEN method using two different nebulizer systems. The NGI was operated using flows of 15 and 30 L min~(-1) at room (ROOM) temperature and immediately after cooling at 5癈 for 90 min (COLD). Two nebulizer systems, the Sidestream jet nebulizer (SIDE) and the Aeroneb Pro (AERO), were used to nebulize terbutaline sulphate respiratory solution. The CEN method was also used to provide the aerodynamic characteristics of the aerosolized dose from these two nebulizer systems. The mean (SD) mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) using 15COLD, 15ROOM, 30COLD, 30ROOM, and CEN for AERO was 5.0(0.1), 4.1(0.3), 4.4(0.2), 2.0(0.3), and 3.0(1.1) mum, respectively, and 4.2(0.4), 2.6(0.4), 3.5(0.1), 1.7(0.1), and 3.2(0.3)mum for SIDE. The fine particle fraction (FPF), using the NGI, followed the expected trend associated with the corresponding MMAD values, ranging from 48.1 to 70.5% from AERO and 57.3 to 87.8% for SIDE. The mean FPF for AERO and SIDE using the CEN methodology was 72.5 and 63.6%. Overall there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between the different operating conditions for the FPF and MMAD of both nebulizer systems. All methods revealed a significant difference between AERO and SIDE except CEN. Both nebulizer systems were prone to evaporation effects during in vitro testing. Cooling and using a slow flow minimizes evaporation effects with the NGI and should be adopted as the recommended compendial method. The CEN method provides different values to those of the NGI operating conditions and could not differentiate between the two nebulizers.
机译:可以使用CEN(prEN13544-1)方法以及最近使用下一代Impactor(NGI)来确定从雾化系统中散发的雾化剂量的特征,但是蒸发作用会影响结果。我们已经研究了使用不同流量和NGI冷却的这些特性,并将结果与​​使用两种不同雾化器系统的标准CEN方法进行了比较。 NGI在室温(ROOM)下使用15和30 L min〜(-1)的流量操作,并在5°C冷却90分钟后立即冷却(COLD)。两种喷雾器系统分别是Sidestream喷射喷雾器(SIDE)和Aeroneb Pro(AERO),用于雾化硫酸特布他林呼吸溶液。 CEN方法还用于提供来自这两个雾化器系统的雾化剂量的空气动力学特性。使用15COLD,15ROOM,30COLD,30ROOM和CEN的AERO的平均(SD)质量中值空气动力学直径(MMAD)为5.0(0.1),4.1(0.3),4.4(0.2),2.0(0.3)和3.0(1.1) )分别为SIDE的4.2(0.4),2.6(0.4),3.5(0.1),1.7(0.1)和3.2(0.3)。使用NGI的细颗粒分数(FPF)遵循与相应的MMAD值相关的预期趋势,AERO范围从48.1至70.5%,SIDE范围从57.3至87.8%。使用CEN方法的AERO和SIDE的平均FPF为72.5和63.6%。总体而言,两种雾化器系统的FPF和MMAD的不同操作条件之间都存在非常显着的差异(p <0.001)。除CEN之外,所有方法均显示AERO和SIDE之间存在显着差异。两种雾化器系统在体外测试期间均易于蒸发。使用NGI进行冷却并使用慢流量可以最大程度地减少蒸发效果,因此应采用推荐的药典方法。 CEN方法提供的值与NGI操作条件的值不同,并且无法区分两个雾化器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号