首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aerosol medicine: the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine >Measurements of Electrodynamic Effects on the Deposition of MDI and DPI Aerosols in a Replica Cast of Human Oral-Pharyngeal-Laryngeal Airways
【24h】

Measurements of Electrodynamic Effects on the Deposition of MDI and DPI Aerosols in a Replica Cast of Human Oral-Pharyngeal-Laryngeal Airways

机译:电学作用对人口咽-喉气道复制品中MDI和DPI气溶胶沉积的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are popular drug delivery devices used in the treatment of respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Integrated effects of electrostatic charges and aerodynamic sizes on the deposition of MDI and DPI particles in a replica cast of human oral-pharyngeal-laryngeal (OPL) airways were examined. Experimental aerosols were generated from commercially available MDI and DPI devices. They are the trademarked brands of the same pharmaceutical company, and contain the same amounts of different drugs. Inhalations were administered as boluses and characterized with an Electronic Single Particle Aerodynamic Relaxation Time (ESPART) analyzer before and after passing through the cadaver-based OPL cast. The MDI and DPI aerosols were not only of different sizes but also carried different positive, negative and zero electrostatic charges; 42.2% of the total number of DPI particles was charged in comparison to 6% of those produced by the MDI. Electrodynamic properties (e.g., charges and sizes) played significant roles on the behavior and deposition of aerosols in the OPL airways. As detailed herein, deposition fractions of the total (charged and uncharged) DPI aerosols were 21.5% in contrast to 2.8% for the MDI aerosols, whereas the charged particle deposition for the DPI was 46.7% in contrast to 22.5% for the MDI. Particle losses in the OPL passages were greater for the DPI than the MDI as the former generated more charged particles than the latter. This finding is consistent with results reported by other researchers but contradicts the observation of another investigator where MDI losses were reported as being higher than those for DPIs. The chief reason for this difference may be that the latter study did not account for the electrical properties of aerosol particles, but only for their mechanical properties. Because the measured deposition efficiencies of MDI and DPI aerosols were different, the data have important implications to inhalation therapy protocols.
机译:计量吸入器(MDI)和干粉吸入器(DPI)是用于治疗呼吸系统疾病(例如哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD))的常用药物输送设备。检验了静电荷和空气动力学尺寸对人口腔咽喉(OPL)气道复制品中MDI和DPI颗粒沉积的综合影响。从市售的MDI和DPI设备产生了实验气雾剂。它们是同一家制药公司的商标品牌,并且包含相同数量的不同药物。吸入以大丸剂形式给药,并在通过基于尸体的OPL演员之前和之后使用电子单粒子空气动力学弛豫时间(ESPART)分析仪进行表征。 MDI和DPI气溶胶不仅大小不同,而且带有不同的正,负和零静电荷。 DPI粒子总数的42.2%被充电,而MDI产生的6%。电动力性质(例如电荷和大小)在OPL气道中的气溶胶行为和沉积中起着重要作用。如本文中所详述,总的(带电和不带电的)DPI气溶胶的沉积分数为21.5%,而MDI气溶胶为2.8%,而DPI的带电粒子沉积为46.7%,而MDI为22.5%。对于DPI,OPL通道中的颗粒损失要比MDI大,因为前者产生的带电颗粒要比后者多。这一发现与其他研究人员报告的结果一致,但与另一名调查人员的观察结果相矛盾,在该研究人员中,MDI损失据报道高于DPI的损失。造成这种差异的主要原因可能是后者的研究并未考虑气溶胶颗粒的电性能,而只是考虑了其机械性能。由于所测得的MDI和DPI气溶胶的沉积效率不同,因此该数据对吸入疗法方案具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号