...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Heparin monotherapy or bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable ischemic heart disease: Results from the evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events registry
【24h】

Heparin monotherapy or bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable ischemic heart disease: Results from the evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events registry

机译:非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征或稳定的缺血性心脏病的患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间进行肝素单药治疗或比伐卢定治疗:药物洗脱支架和缺血事件登记的评估结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-The use of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin monotherapy in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction is not well defned. Methods and Results-The study population consisted of patients enrolled in the Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) registry with either non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable ischemic heart disease, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin monotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. The primary bleeding (inhospital composite bleeding-access site bleeding, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major/minor bleeding, or transfusion) and primary (in-hospital death/myocardial infarction) and secondary ischemic outcomes (death/myocardial infarction/unplanned repeat revascularization at 12 months) were evaluated. Propensity score matching yielded 1036 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes and 2062 patients with stable ischemic heart disease. For the non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome cohort, bivalirudin use was associated with lower bleeding (difference, -3.3% [-0.8% to -5.8%]; P=0.01; number need to treat=30) without increase in either primary (difference, 1.2% [4.1% to -1.8%]; P=0.45) or secondary ischemic outcomes, including stent thrombosis (difference, 0.0% [1.3% to -1.3%]; P=1.00). Similarly, in the stable ischemic heart disease cohort, bivalirudin use was associated with lower bleeding (difference, -1.8% [-0.4% to -3.3%]; P=0.01; number need to treat=53) without increase in either primary (difference, 0.4% [2.3% to -1.5%]; P=0.70) or secondary ischemic outcomes, including stent thrombosis (difference, 0.0% [0.7% to -0.7%]; P=1.00) when compared with unfractionated heparin monotherapy. Conclusions-Among patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable ischemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, bivalirudin use during percutaneous coronary intervention when compared with unfractionated heparin monotherapy was associated with lower bleeding without signifcant increase in ischemic outcomes or stent thrombosis.
机译:背景-在没有ST段抬高型心肌梗死的患者中,比伐卢定与普通肝素单一疗法的使用尚不明确。方法和结果-研究人群包括接受非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征或稳定的缺血性心脏病的药物洗脱支架和缺血事件(EVENT)登记评估的患者,这些患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗普通肝素或比伐卢定单药治疗。倾向得分匹配用于调整基线特征。原发性出血(院内复合出血-局部出血,心肌梗塞的溶栓,大/小出血或输血)和原发性(院内死亡/心肌梗塞)和继发性缺血结局(死亡/心肌梗塞/计划外的重复血运重建于12个月)进行了评估。倾向得分匹配产生了1036例非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征和2062例稳定的缺血性心脏病患者。对于非ST段抬高的急性冠脉综合征人群,使用比伐卢定可降低出血(差异为-3.3%[-0.8%至-5.8%]; P = 0.01;需要治疗的次数= 30)而无增加在原发性(差异为1.2%[4.1%至-1.8%]; P = 0.45)或继发性缺血预后中,包括支架内血栓形成(差异为0.0%[1.3%至-1.3%]; P = 1.00)。同样,在稳定的缺血性心脏病队列中,使用比伐卢定与较低的出血率相关(差异为-1.8%[-0.4%至-3.3%]; P = 0.01;需要治疗的次数= 53),而原发性肝癌的发生率均未增加(与普通肝素单药治疗相比,差异为0.4%[2.3%至-1.5%]; P = 0.70)或继发性缺血结局,包括支架血栓形成(差异为0.0%[0.7%至-0.7%]; P = 1.00)。结论:在非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征或稳定的缺血性心脏病患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,与普通肝素单药治疗相比,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间比伐卢定的使用可减少出血而无缺血性结果或支架明显增加血栓形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号