首页> 外文期刊>Journal for the scientific study of religion >Religion, Secular Humanism, and Atheism: Multi-Institutional Politics and the USAFA Cadets' Freethinkers Group
【24h】

Religion, Secular Humanism, and Atheism: Multi-Institutional Politics and the USAFA Cadets' Freethinkers Group

机译:宗教,世俗人文主义和无神论者:多机构政治和美国空军立宪民主党人的自由思想者小组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent emergence of atheist movements despite marginalization and distrust by a majority of Americans has been explained as a successful deployment of identity politics, but scholars have less often considered the importance of how identity and power intersect with political opportunity occurring within organizational and religious fields. Analyzing the case of the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA) Cadet Freethinkers Group, we demonstrate that although it encountered opportunity in the organizational shock of the 2004 USAFA proselytism controversy, this opportunity was not a blank check, but instead afforded some possibilities for action and not others. Freethinkers' actions to secure official recognition were limited by (1) their low placement in the chain of command and (2) a collective identity inclusive of secular humanism and atheism, which did not produce enough unity to take collective actions risking punishment, and created ambiguity vis-a-vis religion that allowed USAFA administrators to accept or deny their institutional membership claims through appeal, respectively, to functional or substantive definitions of religion.
机译:尽管大多数美国人被边缘化和不信任,无神论运动的最新出现被解释为身份政治的成功部署,但是学者们很少考虑身份和权力与组织和宗教领域发生的政治机会相交的重要性。通过分析美国空军学院(USFA)学员自由思想者小组的案例,我们证明,尽管它在2004年USAFA义卖主义争议的组织冲击中遇到了机遇,但这不是一个空白,而是为行动和提供了一些可能性。没有其他人。自由思想者为获得官方认可而采取的行动受到以下方面的限制:(1)他们在指挥链中的地位低下;(2)包括世俗的人文主义和无神论在内的集体身份,这种集体身份没有产生足够的团结来采取可能遭受惩罚的集体行动。相对于宗教的模棱两可,使美国足球联合会管理人员可以通过对宗教的功能性或实质性定义分别提出上诉来接受或拒绝其机构成员资格要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号