首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
【24h】

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

机译:医学文献用户指南:XXV。循证医学:将《用户指南》应用于患者护理的原则。循证医学工作组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This series provides clinicians with strategies and tools to interpret and integrate evidence from published research in their care of patients. The 2 key principles for applying all the articles in this series to patient care relate to the value-laden nature of clinical decisions and to the hierarchy of evidence postulated by evidence-based medicine. Clinicians need to be able to distinguish high from low quality in primary studies, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and other integrative research focused on management recommendations. An evidence-based practitioner must also understand the patient's circumstances or predicament; identify knowledge gaps and frame questions to fill those gaps; conduct an efficient literature search; critically appraise the research evidence; and apply that evidence to patient care. However, treatment judgments often reflect clinician or societal values concerning whether intervention benefits are worth the cost. Many unanswered questions concerning how to elicit preferences and how to incorporate them in clinical encounters constitute an enormously challenging frontier for evidence-based medicine. Time limitation remains the biggest obstacle to evidence-based practice but clinicians should seek evidence from as high in the appropriate hierarchy of evidence as possible, and every clinical decision should be geared toward the particular circumstances of the patient.
机译:本系列为临床医生提供了策略和工具,以解释和整合已发表的研究结果为患者提供服务的证据。将本系列中的所有文章应用于患者护理的2条关键原则与临床决策的重载性质以及循证医学假设的证据等级有关。临床医生需要能够在基础研究,系统评价,实践指南以及其他侧重于管理建议的综合研究中区分高品质和低品质。循证医生也必须了解患者的情况或困境;找出知识空白并提出问题以填补这些空白;进行有效的文献检索;严格评估研究证据;并将该证据应用于患者护理。但是,治疗判断通常反映出临床医生或社会对干预收益是否值得付出的价值。关于如何引起偏好以及如何将其纳入临床遭遇的许多悬而未决的问题构成了循证医学的巨大挑战。时间限制仍然是循证实践的最大障碍,但临床医生应从适当的证据层次中寻求尽可能高的证据,并且每个临床决策都应针对患者的具体情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号