【24h】

When separate is more equal.

机译:分开时更相等。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

WOMEN CONSTITUTE SLIGHTLY MORE THAN HALF the population of the United States, but bio-medical research has yielded less information on their health than that of men. Despite efforts in the past 2 decades to correct the balance, clinical practice and treatment of diseases other than those occurring primarily or exclusively in women are disproportionately based on research using male models of disease and male participants. Male bias in research is implicit, and its effects are subtle but pervasive. It is seen more clearly when the entire landscape of health research is surveyed. This overview was taken by a recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee and summarized in the report Women's Health Research: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise.1 The report pointed to progress in the conduct of studies specifically involving women and their greater inclusion as research participants. However, it also noted that women are still underrepresented in the design, conduct, and analysis of studies and that these gaps have limited the utility of their findings for improving women's health.
机译:妇女构成的人数略多于美国人口的一半,但是生物医学研究得出的关于其健康状况的信息少于男性。尽管在过去的20年中为纠正这种平衡做出了努力,但基于疾病的男性模型和男性参与者的研究却不成比例地超过了临床实践和疾病的治疗方法,这些疾病主要或仅在女性中发生。男性在研究中的偏见是隐性的,其影响微妙而普遍。当对卫生研究的整个领域进行调查时,可以更清楚地看到。该概述由最近的医学研究所(IOM)委员会进行,并在《妇女健康研究:进展,陷阱和承诺》报告中进行了总结。1该报告指出了专门针对妇女的研究的进展以及将其更多地纳入研究范围参与者。但是,它也指出,妇女在研究的设计,进行和分析中所占的比例仍然不足,这些差距限制了她们的研究结果对改善妇女健康的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号