...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Does this patient have a hemorrhagic stroke?: clinical findings distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke.
【24h】

Does this patient have a hemorrhagic stroke?: clinical findings distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke.

机译:该患者是否患有出血性中风?:临床发现可将出血性中风与缺血性中风区分开。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: The 2 fundamental subtypes of stroke are hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke. Although neuroimaging is required to distinguish these subtypes, the diagnostic accuracy of bedside findings has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of clinical examination in distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches of English-language articles published from January 1966 to April 2010. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective studies of adult patients with stroke that compared initial clinical findings with accepted diagnostic standards of hemorrhagic stroke (computed tomography or autopsy). DATA EXTRACTION: Both authors independently appraised study quality and extracted relevant data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nineteen prospective studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified (N = 6438 patients; n = 1528 [24%] with hemorrhage stroke). Several findings significantly increase the probability of hemorrhagic stroke: coma (likelihood ratio [LR], 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-12), neck stiffness (LR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.9-12.8), seizures accompanying the neurologic deficit (LR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.6-14), diastolic blood pressure greater than 110 mm Hg (LR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.4-14), vomiting (LR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.7-5.5), and headache (LR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8). Other findings decrease the probability of hemorrhage: cervical bruit (LR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.47) and prior transient ischemic attack (LR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.65). A Siriraj score greater than 1 increases the probability of hemorrhage (LR, 5.7; 95% CI, 4.4-7.4) while a score lower than -1 decreases the probability (LR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23-0.37). Nonetheless, many patients with stroke lack any diagnostic finding, and 20% have Siriraj scores between 1 and -1, which are diagnostically unhelpful (LR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.1). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute stroke, certain findings accurately increase or decrease the probability of intracranial hemorrhage, but no finding or combination of findings is definitively diagnostic in all patients, and diagnostic certainty requires neuroimaging.
机译:背景:中风的两种基本亚型是出血性中风和缺血性中风。尽管需要神经影像学来区分这些亚型,但尚未系统地评估床旁发现的诊断准确性。目的:确定临床检查区分出血性中风与缺血性中风的准确性。数据来源:MEDLINE和EMBASE,检索1966年1月至2010年4月发表的英语文章。研究选择:对成年卒中患者的前瞻性研究,将初始临床表现与出血性卒中的诊断标准(计算机断层扫描或尸检)进行了比较。数据提取:两位作者独立评估研究质量并提取相关数据。数据综合:确定了十九项符合纳入标准的前瞻性研究(N = 6438例患者; n = 1528 [24%]伴有出血性中风)。一些发现显着增加了出血性中风的可能性:昏迷(似然比[LR],6.2; 95%置信区间[CI],3.2-12),颈部僵硬(LR,5.0; 95%CI,1.9-12.8),癫痫发作伴有神经功能缺损(LR,4.7; 95%CI,1.6-14),舒张压大于110 mm Hg(LR,4.3; 95%CI,1.4-14),呕吐(LR,3.0; 95%CI, 1.7-5.5)和头痛(LR,2.9; 95%CI,1.7-4.8)。其他发现降低了出血的可能性:宫颈擦伤(LR,0.12; 95%CI,0.03-0.47)和先前的短暂性脑缺血发作(LR,0.34; 95%CI,0.18-0.65)。 Siriraj得分大于1会增加出血的可能性(LR,5.7; 95%CI,4.4-7.4),而得分低于-1则降低出血的可能性(LR,0.29; 95%CI,0.23-0.37)。但是,许多中风患者没有任何诊断发现,有20%的Siriraj评分在1到-1之间,对诊断无帮助(LR,0.94; 95%CI,0.77-1.1)。结论:在急性中风患者中,某些发现准确地增加或减少了颅内出血的可能性,但是没有发现或发现的组合对所有患者都具有明确的诊断意义,并且诊断的确定性需要神经影像学检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号