首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trial.
【24h】

Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trial.

机译:在日常临床实践中比较紫杉醇和西罗莫司洗脱支架:SORT OUT II随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Approval of drug-eluting coronary stents was based on results of relatively small trials of selected patients; however, in routine practice, stents are used in a broader spectrum of patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the first 2 commercially available drug-eluting stents-sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting-for prevention of symptom-driven clinical end points, using a study design reflecting everyday clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, blinded trial conducted August 2004 to January 2006 at 5 university hospitals in Denmark. Patients were 2098 men and women (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.8] years) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and randomized to receive either sirolimus-eluting (n = 1065) or paclitaxel-eluting (n = 1033) stents. Indications for PCI included ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI or unstable angina pectoris, and stable angina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was a composite clinical end point of major adverse cardiac events, defined as either cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary end points included individual components of the composite end point, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis. RESULTS: The sirolimus- and the paclitaxel-eluting stent groups did not differ significantly in major adverse cardiac events (98 [9.3%] vs 114 [11.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.08]; P = .16) or in any of the secondary end points. The stent thrombosis rates were 27 (2.5%) and 30 (2.9%) (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.46]; P = .60), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this practical randomized trial, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients receiving sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00388934.
机译:背景:药物洗脱冠状动脉支架的批准基于对选定患者的相对较小的试验结果。然而,在常规实践中,支架被用于更广泛的患者中。目的:使用反映日常临床实践的研究设计,比较前两种市售药物洗脱支架西罗莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱,以预防症状驱动的临床终点。设计,地点和患者:2004年8月至2006年1月在丹麦5所大学医院进行的随机,盲法试验。患者为2098名男性和女性(平均[SD]年龄,63.6 [10.8]岁),接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),并随机接受西罗莫司洗脱(n = 1065)或紫杉醇洗脱(n = 1033)支架。 PCI的适应症包括ST段抬高型心肌梗塞(STEMI),非STEMI或不稳定型心绞痛和稳定型心绞痛。主要观察指标:主要终点是主要不良心脏事件的复合临床终点,定义为心脏死亡,急性心肌梗塞,目标病变血运重建或目标血管血运重建。次要终点包括复合终点的各个组成部分,全因死亡率和支架血栓形成。结果:在主要不良心脏事件中,西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架组无显着差异(98 [9.3%] vs 114 [11.2%];危险比为0.83 [95%置信区间为0.63-1.08]; P = .16)或任何次级端点。支架的血栓形成率分别为27(2.5%)和30(2.9%)(危险比,0.87 [95%置信区间,0.52-1.46]; P = 0.60)。结论:在这项实用的随机试验中,接受西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架的患者在临床结局方面无显着差异。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00388934。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号