首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Discordance between patient-predicted and model-predicted life expectancy among ambulatory patients with heart failure.
【24h】

Discordance between patient-predicted and model-predicted life expectancy among ambulatory patients with heart failure.

机译:动态心衰患者的患者预测寿命与模型预测寿命之间的不一致。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Patients with chronic heart failure have impaired long-term survival, but their own expectations regarding prognosis have not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: To quantify expectations for survival in patients with heart failure, to compare patient expectations to model predictions, and to identify factors associated with discrepancies between patient-predicted and model-predicted prognosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective face-to-face survey of patients from the single-center Duke Heart Failure Disease Management Program between July and December 2004, with follow-up through February 2008. Patient-predicted life expectancy was obtained using a visual analog scale. Model-predicted life expectancy was calculated using the Seattle Heart Failure Model. Actuarial-predicted life expectancy, based on age and sex alone, was calculated using life tables. Observed survival was determined from review of medical records and search of the Social Security Death Index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Lifeexpectancy ratio (LER), defined as the ratio of patient-predicted to model-predicted life expectancy. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 122 patients (mean age, 62 years; 47% African American, 42% New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV). On average, patients overestimated their life expectancy relative to model-predicted life expectancy (median patient-predicted life expectancy, 13.0 years; model-predicted expectancy, 10.0 years). Median LER was 1.4 (interquartile range, 0.8-2.5). Younger age, increased NYHA class, lower ejection fraction, and less depression were the most significant predictors of higher LER. During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 29% of the original cohort died. There was no association between higher LER and improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio for overestimated compared with concordant LER, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-2.42). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory patients with heart failure tended to substantially overestimate their life expectancy compared with model-based predictions for survival. Because differences in perceived survival could affect decision making regarding advanced therapies and end-of-life planning, the causes of these discordant predictions warrant further study.
机译:语境:慢性心力衰竭患者的长期生存受到损害,但是他们对预后的期望尚未得到很好的研究。目的:量化心力衰竭患者的生存期望,将患者的期望与模型预测进行比较,并确定与患者预测的与模型预测的预后差异相关的因素。设计,地点和参与者:2004年7月至2004年12月在单中心Duke心力衰竭疾病管理计划中对患者进行了前瞻性面对面调查,并随访至2008年2月。患者预期寿命是通过使用视觉模拟量表。使用西雅图心力衰竭模型计算模型预测的预期寿命。仅根据年龄和性别,就可以通过寿命表计算出精算预测的预期寿命。通过检查病历和搜索社会保障死亡指数来确定观察到的存活率。主要观察指标:预期寿命比(LER),定义为患者预测寿命与模型预测寿命的比率。结果:该队列包括122名患者(平均年龄62岁; 47%的非洲裔美国人,42%的纽约心脏协会[NYHA] III或IV级患者)。平均而言,患者相对于模型预测的预期寿命高估了预期寿命(患者预测的预期平均寿命为13.0岁;模型预测的预期平均寿命为10.0岁)。 LER中位数为1.4(四分位间距为0.8-2.5)。年龄较小,NYHA分级增加,射血分数降低和抑郁症减少是LER升高的最重要预测因素。在3.1年的中位随访期间,有29%的原始队列死亡。较高的LER与改善的生存率之间没有关联(与一致的LER相比,高估的调整风险比为1.05; 95%的置信区间为0.46-2.42)。结论:与基于模型的生存预测相比,非住院性心力衰竭患者倾向于大大高估其预期寿命。由于感知生存率的差异可能会影响有关高级疗法和生命周期规划的决策,因此,这些不一致的预测的原因值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号