...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).
【24h】

Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).

机译:症状发作后很早就对急性心肌梗死院前开始的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗进行随机比较:LIPSIA-STEMI试验(莱比锡临院前即刻在ST段心肌梗死中促进血管成形术)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter trial sought to assess the merits of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus primary PCI in an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network with long transfer distances in patients presenting early after symptom onset. BACKGROUND: Facilitated PCI with fibrinolysis might be beneficial in specific high-risk STEMI situations to prevent myocardial necrosis expansion. METHODS: Patients with STEMI (<3 h after symptom onset) were randomized to either pre-hospital-initiated facilitated PCI using tenecteplase (Group A; n = 81) or primary PCI (Group B; n = 81) plus optimal antithrombotic comedication. The primary endpoint was infarct size assessed by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary endpoints were microvascular obstruction and myocardial salvage, early ST-segment resolution, and a composite of death, repeated myocardial infarctions, and congestive heart failure within 30 days. RESULTS: The median time from symptom onset to randomization was 64 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 42 to 103 min) in Group A versus 55 min in Group B (IQR: 27 to 91 min; p = 0.26). Despite better pre-interventional TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow in Group A (71% vs. 35% TIMI flow grade 2 or 3; p < 0.001), the infarct size tended to be worse in Group A versus Group B (17.9% of left ventricle [IQR: 8.4% to 35.0%] vs. 13.7% [IQR: 7.5% to 24.0%]; p = 0.10). There was also a strong trend toward more early and late microvascular obstruction, (p = 0.06 and 0.09) and no difference in ST-segment resolution (p = 0.26). The combined clinical endpoint showed a trend toward higher event rates in Group A (19.8% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.13, relative risk: 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.23 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients presenting early after symptom onset with relatively long transfer times, a fibrinolytic-based facilitated PCI approach with optimal antiplatelet comedication does not offer a benefit over primary PCI with respect to infarct size and tissue perfusion. ([LIPSIA-STEMI] The Leipzig Immediate Prehospital Facilitated Angioplasty in ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction; NCT00359918).
机译:目的:该多中心试验旨在评估症状发作后早期出现的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)网络中长距离转移的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与原发性PCI的优点。背景:在特定的高危STEMI情况下,纤维蛋白溶解促进PCI可能有益于预防心肌坏死的扩大。方法:将STEMI(症状发作后<3 h)患者随机分为使用tenecteplase(A组; n = 81)或原发PCI(B组; n = 81)加最佳抗栓治疗的住院前启动的PCI。主要终点是通过延迟增强磁共振成像评估的梗死面积。次要终点是30天内微血管阻塞和心肌抢救,早期ST段消退以及死亡,反复心肌梗塞和充血性心力衰竭的复合体。结果:从症状发作到随机分组的中位时间在A组为64分钟(四分位间距[IQR]:42至103分钟),而B组为55分钟(IQR:27至91分钟; p = 0.26)。尽管A组介入前的TIMI(心肌梗塞溶栓)流量更好(71%vs.2%或3级TIMI流量为35%; p <0.001),但A组的梗死面积往往比B组要差(17.9)左心室百分比[IQR:8.4%至35.0%]与13.7%[IQR:7.5%至24.0%; p = 0.10)。早期和晚期微血管阻塞也有很强的趋势(p = 0.06和0.09),ST段分辨率无差异(p = 0.26)。综合临床终点显示,A组的事件发生率呈上升趋势(19.8%vs. 13.6%; p = 0.13,相对风险:0.52,95%置信区间:0.23至1.18)。结论:在症状发作后较早出现且转移时间相对较长的STEMI患者中,基于纤维蛋白溶解的促进性PCI方法具有最佳的抗血小板喜剧性,在梗死面积和组织灌注方面,不优于原发性PCI。 ([LIPSIA-STEMI]莱比锡在ST段心肌梗死前立即进行院前血管成形术; NCT00359918)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号