...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Stevens-johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: Are drug dictionaries correctly informing physicians regarding the risk?
【24h】

Stevens-johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: Are drug dictionaries correctly informing physicians regarding the risk?

机译:史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合症/中毒性表皮坏死溶解:药物词典是否正确告知医师有关风险的信息?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are severe drug reactions associated with high mortality and multiple incapacitating sequelae. In the past 20 years, two large multinational case control studies, published in 1995 and 2008, had identified different degrees of drug association with SJS/TEN: 'strongly associated', 'associated', 'suspected' and 'not suspected' medications. Objective: The aim of this study was to check the adequacy of mention of risk of SJS/TEN in the drug dictionaries most widely used by physicians in five European countries. Study Design: In each country one expert investigator looked at the most widely used drug dictionary (2009 edition) for mentions of risk of SJS/TEN. This was done for a predefined list of medications with a different degree of risk. The presence and clarity or absence of warning was compared with available evidence provided by published results from case-control studies. Setting: The five countries participating in the RegiSCAR group: Austria, France, Germany, The Netherlands and the UK. Results: A total of 3,268 drug descriptions of medications for systemic use were analysed, including all brands of 14 'strongly associated' drugs, 5 'associated' drugs and 12 widely used drugs with no established association. Discrepancies were found by country, and between descriptions for different brands of the same generic. Among 522 descriptions of 14 'strongly associated' drugs, only 5 did not mention the risk. For the 1,013 descriptions of 'associated' drugs, 3 % did not mention the risk. One-third of 'not suspected' drugs contained a specific or less specific warning (e.g. bullous cutaneous eruption). Warnings for 'strongly associated' medications were often as imprecise as those for 'not suspected' drugs. Conclusion: Information on the risk of SJS/TEN in drug dictionaries needs improvement to enhance the quality of advice given by general physicians and to raise the understanding of risk by patients.
机译:背景:史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合症/中毒性表皮坏死溶解症(SJS / TEN)是与高死亡率和多发性无行为能力后遗症相关的严重药物反应。在过去的20年中,1995年和2008年发表的两项大型跨国病例对照研究确定了SJS / TEN与药物的关联程度不同:“高度关联”,“关联”,“怀疑”和“未怀疑”药物。目的:本研究的目的是检查五个欧洲国家最广泛使用的药物词典中提及SJS / TEN风险的适当性。研究设计:在每个国家,一位专家研究人员查看了使用最广泛的药物词典(2009年版),其中提到了SJS / TEN的风险。这样做是针对具有不同风险程度的预定义药物清单。将警告的存在与否,清楚与否与病例对照研究的已发表结果提供的现有证据进行了比较。地点:参加RegiSCAR小组的五个国家:奥地利,法国,德国,荷兰和英国。结果:共分析了3268种全身性用药的药物描述,包括所有品牌的14种“强关联”药物,5种“关联”药物和12种没有明确关联的广泛使用药物。在国家/地区和同一品牌的不同品牌的说明之间发现差异。在522种对14种“强关联”药物的描述中,只有5种没有提及这种风险。对于1,013种“相关”药物的描述,有3%未提及该风险。三分之一的``未怀疑''药物含有特定或较不具体的警告(例如大疱性皮肤喷发)。 “强关联”药物的警告通常与“未怀疑”药物的警告一样不准确。结论:有关药物词典中SJS / TEN风险的信息需要改进,以提高普通医生提供的建议的质量并提高患者对风险的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号