首页> 外文期刊>Drug and alcohol review >Newspaper coverage of drug policy: an analysis of pre-election reporting of the Greens' drug policy in Australia.
【24h】

Newspaper coverage of drug policy: an analysis of pre-election reporting of the Greens' drug policy in Australia.

机译:毒品政策的报纸报道:澳大利亚绿党毒品政策的大选前报告分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: With the headline 'Ecstasy Over The Counter' in a popular daily newspaper, the debate on drug policy officially entered the arena of the 2003 New South Wales (Australia) State Election. The debate resurfaced in the lead-up to the 2004 Australian Federal Election. This paper analyses the pre-election coverage of drug policy issues in four Australian newspapers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Four high-circulation daily newspapers were monitored for a one-month period prior to both elections and analysed for their coverage of drug policy, particularly with respect to the policy of the Greens. RESULTS: The newspapers took different perspectives on drug policy issues, with two framing it in emotive terms as a moral debate and two framing it as political manoeuvring. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The newspapers focused upon emotive and sensationalist factors. They did not provide their readers with information or a rationale for the formulation of drug policy, be this from a harm minimisation or zero tolerance perspective.
机译:引言和目的:在一家流行的日报上,标题为“柜台上的迷魂药”,有关毒品政策的辩论正式进入2003年新南威尔士州(澳大利亚)州选举的舞台。辩论在2004年澳大利亚联邦大选的筹备阶段再次浮出水面。本文分析了澳大利亚四家报纸在大选前对毒品政策问题的报道。设计与方法:在两次大选之前的一个月内,对四份高发行量的日报进行了监测,并对其毒品政策的覆盖范围进行了分析,尤其是针对绿色党的政策。结果:报纸在毒品政策问题上有不同的看法,其中两种以情感的方式将其视为道德辩论,而另两种则将其视为政治手段。讨论与结论:报纸侧重于情感和耸人听闻的因素。他们没有为读者提供制定毒品政策的信息或理由,无论是从危害最小化还是零容忍的角度来看。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号