...
首页> 外文期刊>DMW: Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift >Hospital surveillance during major outbreaks of community-acquired diseases: Pandemic influenza hospital surveillance (PIKS) 2009/2010 and surveillance of bloody diarrhea (SBD) 2011 [Krankenhaus-Surveillance w?hrend gro?er Ausbr??che ambulant erworbener Erkrankungen: Die Pandemische-Influenza-Krankenhaus-Surveillance (PIKS) 2009/2010 und die Surveillance blutiger Durchf?lle (SBD) 2011]
【24h】

Hospital surveillance during major outbreaks of community-acquired diseases: Pandemic influenza hospital surveillance (PIKS) 2009/2010 and surveillance of bloody diarrhea (SBD) 2011 [Krankenhaus-Surveillance w?hrend gro?er Ausbr??che ambulant erworbener Erkrankungen: Die Pandemische-Influenza-Krankenhaus-Surveillance (PIKS) 2009/2010 und die Surveillance blutiger Durchf?lle (SBD) 2011]

机译:社区获得性疾病重大暴发期间的医院监视:2009/2010年大流行性流感医院监视(PIKS)和2011年血液性腹泻(SBD)监视[社区获得性疾病重大暴发期间的医院监视:大流行-2009/2010年的流感医院监视(PIKS)和2011年的血性腹泻(SBD)监视]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and objective: During the influenza pandemic 2009/2010 and the outbreak of entero-haemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC)/hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) 2011, the statutory reporting system in Germany was complemented by additional event-related surveillance systems in hospitals. The Pandemic Influenza Hospital Surveillance (PIKS) and the Surveillance of Bloody Diarrhea (SBD) were evaluated, to make experiences available for similar future situations. Methods: The description and evaluation of our surveillance systems is based on the "Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems" published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2001. Results: PIKS and SBD could be implemented quickly and were able to capture resilient data in a timely manner both on the severity and course of the influenza pandemic 2009/2010 and the outbreak of EHEC and HUS 2011. Although lacking in representativeness, sensitive and useful data were generated. Conclusion: In large outbreaks of severe diseases, the establishment of specific hospital surveillance should be considered as early as possible. In Germany, the participating hospitals were able to rapidly implement the required measures. ? Georg ThiemeVerlag KG ?? Stuttgart ?? New York.
机译:背景和目的:在2009/2010年流感大流行和2011年肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)/溶血尿毒综合症(HUS)爆发期间,德国的法定报告系统得到了医院其他事件相关监视系统的补充。对大流行性流感医院监视(PIKS)和血液性腹泻监视(SBD)进行了评估,以为以后的类似情况提供经验。方法:我们的监视系统的描述和评估是基于2001年美国疾病控制和预防中心发布的“评估公共卫生监视系统的更新指南”。结果:PIKS和SBD可以快速实施,并且能够及时捕获有关2009/2010年流感大流行的严重程度和过程以及EHEC和HUS 2011爆发的弹性数据。尽管缺乏代表性,但仍生成了敏感而有用的数据。结论:在大规模的重大疾病暴发中,应尽早考虑建立专门的医院监测机构。在德国,参与活动的医院能够迅速执行所需的措施。 ? Georg ThiemeVerlag KG ??斯图加特纽约。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号