首页> 外文期刊>Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice >'All hazards approach' to disaster management: the role of information and knowledge management, Boyd's OODA Loop, and network-centricity.
【24h】

'All hazards approach' to disaster management: the role of information and knowledge management, Boyd's OODA Loop, and network-centricity.

机译:灾难管理的“所有危害方法”:信息和知识管理的角色,博伊德的OODA循环以及以网络为中心。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ever-increasing complexity of disasters demands utilisation of knowledge that exists outside domains traditionally drawn upon in disaster management. To be operationally useful, such knowledge must he extracted, combined with information generated by the disaster itself, and transformed into actionable knowledge. The process, though, is hampered by existing, business-oriented approaches to knowledge management, by technical issues related to access to relevant, multi-domain information/knowledge, and by executive decision-making processes based predominantly on historical knowledge. Consequently, as shown by many recent incidents, the management of large-scale (mega) disasters is often inefficient and exceedingly costly. This paper demonstrates that the integration of modified information and knowledge management into the concepts of network-centric operations and network-enabled capabilities, and the employment of Boyd's OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act) Loop-based decision-making in unpredictable and dynamically changing environments, may address some of these problems.
机译:灾难的日益复杂性要求利用传统上在灾难管理中使用的领域之外的知识。为了在操作上有用,必须提取这些知识,并结合灾难本身产生的信息,并将其转化为可操作的知识。但是,该过程受到现有的面向业务的知识管理方法,与访问相关的多域信息/知识有关的技术问题以及主要基于历史知识的行政决策过程的阻碍。因此,正如最近的许多事件所表明的那样,大规模(大型)灾难的管理通常效率低下且成本高昂。本文证明,将修改后的信息和知识管理集成到以网络为中心的操作和网络支持的功能的概念中,以及使用博伊德的OODA(观察,定向,决策和行为)基于循环的决策无法预测动态变化的环境可能会解决其中一些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号