...
首页> 外文期刊>The Electricity journal >Not According To the High Court, Professor Wolak
【24h】

Not According To the High Court, Professor Wolak

机译:根据高等法院的说法,沃拉克教授

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2003, The Electricity Journal presented a set of articles under the rubric, “Debating California.” Prof. Frank Wolak detailed a plan to extract ourselves from the mess (which at that point was almost three years old) and I wrote a piece criticizing Prof. Wolak's plan, which he in turn rebutted under the editors’ engaging title, “Sorry Mr. Falk: It's Too Late to Implement Your Recommendations Now.”1 It's now almost five years later and I’ve had to wait that long to offer this response. Why? Because only in June did the Supreme Court finally offer an opinion on the issue that we were discussing at that time. And it turns out that it's not too late after all – but only if the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission acts appropriately.
机译:2003年,《电力杂志》在标题为“辩论加利福尼亚”下发表了一系列文章。弗兰克·沃拉克(Frank Wolak)教授详细介绍了从混乱中解脱出来的计划(当时已经将近三年了),我写了一篇批评沃拉克(Wolak)教授的计划的文章,他反过来以编辑的引人入胜的标题“对不起,先生福尔克:现在实施您的建议为时已晚。1现在已经快五年了,我不得不等待那么长时间才能做出回应。为什么?因为仅在6月,最高法院才对我们当时正在讨论的问题发表了意见。事实证明,现在还不算太晚-仅在联邦能源监管委员会采取适当行动的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号