...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic molecular pathology : >Expression analysis on archival material: comparison of 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits for FFPE material.
【24h】

Expression analysis on archival material: comparison of 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits for FFPE material.

机译:档案材料的表达分析:比较5种市售的FFPE材料RNA分离试剂盒。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most common tissue specimen widely available. Moreover, long clinical follow-up is on hand. Therefore, FFPE material is a precious source of material for identifying predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers in cancer research on the basis of gene expression. However, the main drawback of FFPE tissue is the significant reduction in quantity and quality of the extracted RNA. The aim of this study is the comparison of different commercially available kits for the RNA isolation in FFPE tissue material. METHODS: Five commercially available RNA isolation kits were tested and the concentration, purity, integrity, and raw cycle threshold values were determined. RESULTS: The mean total RNA concentrations were as follows: Qiagen 25957+/-19417 ng, Ambion 8249+/-2898 ng, SA Biosciences 8070+/-3700 ng, and Macherey-Nagel 622+/-394 ng. The mean A260/A280 ratios were as follows: Qiagen: 1.81, SA Biosciences: 0.66, Ambion: 1.03, and Macherey-Nagel: 1.04. The mean A260/A230 ratios were as follows: Qiagen: 1.88, SA Biosciences: 1.61, Ambion: 1.54, and Macherey-Nagel: 1.88. The RNA extractions from Epicentre could not be measured by the Nanodrop and, therefore, were excluded from further analysis. The mean RNA integrity number (range, 2.09 to 2.47) and the mean raw cycle threshold values (range, 33.43 to 35.37) were more or less the same for all the tested RNA isolation kits. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, on the basis of the number of adequate isolations, the kit from Qiagen seems to be the most appropriate kit to be used in our further studies that require RNA isolation from FFPE material.
机译:背景:福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织是可广泛获得的最常见的组织标本。而且,即将进行长期的临床随访。因此,FFPE材料是用于基于基因表达鉴定癌症研究中的预测和/或预后生物标志物的宝贵材料来源。但是,FFPE组织的主要缺点是提取的RNA的数量和质量显着降低。这项研究的目的是比较用于FFPE组织材料中RNA分离的各种市售试剂盒。方法:测试了五种市售RNA分离试剂盒,并确定了浓度,纯度,完整性和原始循环阈值。结果:平均总RNA浓度如下:Qiagen 25957 +/- 19417 ng,Ambion 8249 +/- 2898 ng,SA Biosciences 8070 +/- 3700 ng和Macherey-Nagel 622 +/- 394 ng。 A260 / A280的平均比率如下:Qiagen:1.81,SA Biosciences:0.66,Ambion:1.03和Macherey-Nagel:1.04。 A260 / A230的平均比率如下:Qiagen:1.88,SA Biosciences:1.61,Ambion:1.54,Macherey-Nagel:1.88。 Nanodrop无法测量从Epicenter提取的RNA,因此无法进行进一步分析。对于所有测试的RNA分离试剂盒,平均RNA完整性数(范围为2.09至2.47)和平均原始周期阈值(范围为33.43至35.37)大致相同。结论:总而言之,基于充分分离的数量,Qiagen公司的试剂盒似乎是最适合用于需要从FFPE材料中分离RNA的进一步研究的试剂盒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号