...
首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >Cultural border, administrative border, and regional economic development: Evidence from Chinese cities
【24h】

Cultural border, administrative border, and regional economic development: Evidence from Chinese cities

机译:文化边界,行政边界和区域经济发展:来自中国城市的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current province-level administrative division in China breaks the distribution of local culture and many cities are separated from their respective local culture regions to locate in other provinces. These cities encounter potential cultural conflicts with the mainstream culture of the provinces they belong to, but also face various local protectionism barriers with cities in the neighboring province that share the same border and local culture with them. As a result, transaction costs could be higher whichever side they trade with, leading to potential harm to their economic development. Using dialect as a proxy for local culture, we find that the cultural segmentation caused by the misalignment between cultural and administrative borders can significantly hamper economic development of the segmented cities. This negative effect is aggravated by greater local protectionism in neighboring provinces but alleviated by a longer history of being administrated by the same province with the current provincial capital. These findings support the hypothesis that cultural and administrative border misalignment works together with local protectionism to bring about substantial economic loss. The results thus highlight the importance of both formal and informal institutions in affecting transaction costs and economic growth, and also shed light on the potential interactions between the two types of institutions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:中国目前的省级行政区划打破了本地文化的分布,许多城市与各自的本地文化区分开,以位于其他省份。这些城市与其所属省份的主流文化存在潜在的文化冲突,但与邻近省份的城市有着相同边界和当地文化的城市也面临着各种地方保护主义的障碍。结果,无论与谁进行交易,交易成本都可能更高,从而对其经济发展造成潜在的损害。用方言作为当地文化的代表,我们发现由文化和行政边界之间的错位引起的文化分割会严重阻碍分割城市的经济发展。邻近省份更大的地方保护主义加剧了这种负面影响,但与当前省会城市由同一省份实行较长的行政历史则减轻了这种负面影响。这些发现支持以下假设:文化和行政边界错位与地方保护主义共同作用,造成了巨大的经济损失。因此,结果突出了正式和非正式机构在影响交易成本和经济增长中的重要性,并阐明了两种机构之间的潜在相互作用。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号