首页> 外文期刊>Death studies >CONCEPTUALIZING DEATH IN A WORLDVIEW CONSISTENT, MEANINGFUL WAY AND ITS EFFECTS ON WORLDVIEW DEFENSE
【24h】

CONCEPTUALIZING DEATH IN A WORLDVIEW CONSISTENT, MEANINGFUL WAY AND ITS EFFECTS ON WORLDVIEW DEFENSE

机译:在世界观中构想死亡一致,有意义的方式及其对世界观防御的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research within terror management theory (TMT) has shown that when mortality is made salient, people subsequently engage in worldview defense: an increase in derogation of an individual who does not share their worldview along with an increase in veneration of an individual who does. Research has also shown that high levels of self-esteem (either dispositionally possessed or artificially enhanced) or legitimization of one's meaning supplying system (worldview) can attenuate the increase in worldview defense typically seen after mortality salience. Extending these findings, this research examined the hypothesis that motivating participants to consider their mortality in a manner that was personally meaningful and thus consistent with their particular worldview would also serve to assuage the need for worldview defense. The research reported below supported this reasoning. Specifically, participants with a Christian religious background who were given the typical mortality salience prime produced more positive evaluations of a Christian target and more negative evaluations of a Jewish target. However, participants with a Christian religious background who were presented with a meaningful mortality salience induction produced evaluations of the Christian and Jewish targets that did not differ. The implications of conceptualizing death meaningfully are discussed.
机译:恐怖管理理论(TMT)中的研究表明,当死亡率显着提高时,人们随后便会参与世界观防御:不分享其世界观的人的克减增加,而不分享自己世界观的人的尊敬则增加。研究还表明,高水平的自尊(无论是性格地拥有还是人为地增强)或一个人的意义提供系统(世界观)的合法化可以削弱通常在死亡率显着后出现的世界观防御的增长。通过扩展这些发现,本研究检验了以下假设:激励参与者以对个人有意义的方式考虑其死亡率,从而与他们的特定世界观保持一致,这也将有助于缓解对世界观防御的需求。下面报告的研究支持了这种推理。具体而言,具有基督教宗教背景的参与者被给予典型的死亡显着性素养,他们对基督徒的目标做出了更加积极的评价,对犹太人的目标做出了更多的负面评价。但是,具有基督教宗教背景的参与者被给予有意义的死亡率显着性诱导,他们对基督教和犹太人的目标进行了评估,两者没有差异。讨论了有意义地概念化死亡的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号