首页> 外文期刊>HIV clinical trials >Liver toxicity of initial antiretroviral drug regimens including two nucleoside analogs plus one non-nucleoside analog or one ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients
【24h】

Liver toxicity of initial antiretroviral drug regimens including two nucleoside analogs plus one non-nucleoside analog or one ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

机译:最初的抗逆转录病毒药物治疗方案在HIV / HCV合并感染患者中的肝毒性包括两种核苷类似物加一种非核苷类似物或一种利托那韦增强的蛋白酶抑制剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations (TE) and grade 4 total bilirubin elevations (TBE) among HIV/HCV- coinfected treatment-na?ve patients with an initial regimen including 2 nucleoside analogs plus efavirenz (EFV), nevirapine (NVP), or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r).Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study that recruited 745 HIV-infected drug-na?ve patients with detectable plasma HCV RNA who started a regimen including EFV, NVP, or PI/r.Results: EFV was prescribed in 323 (43%), NVP in 126 (17%), and a PI/r in 296 (40%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 TE were observed in 19 (5.9%) individuals receiving EFV compared with 14 (11%) on NVP (P = .056) and 31 (10.5%) on PI/r (P = .036). Grade 4 TBE were identified in 7 (2.2%) patients on EFV, 1 (0.8%) on NVP, and 11 (3.7%) on PI/r (P = .19). Therapy was discontinued due to liver toxicity in 13 (4%) patients on EFV, 16 (13%) on NVP, and 17 (6%) on PI/r (P = .003).Conclusions: Regimens including EFV, NVP, or PI/r are generally safe in treatment-na?ve HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Grade 3-4 TE are less commonly seen with EFV than with PI/r. Discontinuations due to hepatotoxicity were less frequent for patients receiving EFV than for those treated with NVP.
机译:目的:评估初治方案(包括2种核苷类似物)的HIV / HCV合并初治患者的3或4级ALT或AST升高(TE)和4级总胆红素升高(TBE)的发生率和危险因素病人和方法:这是一项回顾性多中心观察性队列研究,该研究招募了745名接受过HIV感染但未检测到药物的患者。结果:开始使用EFV,NVP或PI / r方案的血浆HCV RNA。结果:323例(43%)服用EFV,126例(17%)服用NVP,296例(40%)接受PI / r。在接受EFV的19名患者中,观察到3级或4级TE(5.9%),相比之下,NVP(P = .056)为14(11%),PI / r为31(10.5%)(P = .036)。在7例(2.2%)的EFV患者,1例(0.8%)的NVP患者和11例(3.7%)的PI / r患者中确定了4级TBE(P = .19)。在13例接受EFV的患者(4%),NVP接受16例(13%)和PI / r接受17例(6%)的肝脏毒性下中止了治疗(P = 0.003)。结论:包括EFV,NVP,或PI / r在未接受过HIV / HCV感染的初治患者中通常是安全的。 EFV较PI / r少见3-4级TE。与接受NVP治疗的患者相比,接受EFV的患者因肝毒性引起的停药较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号