首页> 外文期刊>Hydrocarbon Processing >Feedback from a pump person
【24h】

Feedback from a pump person

机译:泵人的反馈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In early 2009, we responded to a reader's request for data; he wanted to use it in a site-wide benchmarking project for pump reliability. The reader was employed at a company location that encompassed close to 1,000 centrifugal process pumps.We shared our response in a "Letter to the Editor" in an earlier issue of HP. In essence, we mentioned that the readers company managers had wanted to know-in the 1980s-why they were not among "best-of-class" in pump MTBF. At that time, the shortcomings of their practice of stilt-mounting base plates, "standardizing" on certain seals and couplings, disregarding specific lubricant application weaknesses, etc., were pointed out to his employers. Regrettably, but not totally unexpectedly, pointing out these and other flaws and impediments to high reliability had caused defensive reactions.
机译:在2009年初,我们响应了读者的数据要求;他希望将其用于整个站点的基准测试项目中,以提高泵的可靠性。该读者在公司所在地工作,该公司拥有近1,000台离心式流程泵。我们在上一期HP的“致编辑的信”中分享了我们的反馈。从本质上讲,我们提到读者公司的经理们想知道-在1980年代-为什么他们不是泵MTBF的“最佳”。当时,他的雇主指出了他们的做法,即高跷安装底板,在某些密封件和联轴器上“标准化”,无视润滑剂使用的特定弱点等做法的缺点。遗憾的是,但并非完全意外,指出了这些以及其他缺陷以及阻碍高可靠性的因素已经引起了防御性反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号