...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Intercomparison of four remote-sensing-based energy balance methods to retrieve surface evapotranspiration and water stress of irrigated fields in semi-arid climate
【24h】

Intercomparison of four remote-sensing-based energy balance methods to retrieve surface evapotranspiration and water stress of irrigated fields in semi-arid climate

机译:四种基于遥感的能量平​​衡方法的比对,以检索半干旱气候下灌溉田的表面蒸散量和水分胁迫

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Instantaneous evapotranspiration rates and surface water stress levels can be deduced from remotely sensed surface temperature data through the surface energy budget. Two families of methods can be defined: the contextual methods, where stress levels are scaled on a given image between hot/dry and cool/wet pixels for a particular vegetation cover, and single-pixel methods, which evaluate latent heat as the residual of the surface energy balance for one pixel independently from the others. Four models, two contextual (S-SEBI and a modified triangle method, named VIT) and two single-pixel (TSEB, SEBS) are applied over one growing season (December-May) for a 4 km×4 km irrigated agricultural area in the semi-arid northern Mexico. Their performance, both at local and spatial standpoints, are compared relatively to energy balance data acquired at seven locations within the area, as well as an uncalibrated soil- vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) model forced with local in situ data including observed irrigation and rainfall amounts. Stress levels are not always well retrieved by most models, but S-SEBI as well as TSEB, although slightly biased, show good performance. The drop in model performance is observed for all models when vegetation is senescent, mostly due to a poor partitioning both between turbulent fluxes and between the soil/plant components of the latent heat flux and the available energy. As expected, contextual methods perform well when contrasted soil moisture and vegetation conditions are encountered in the same image (therefore, especially in spring and early summer) while they tend to exaggerate the spread in water status in more homogeneous conditions (especially in winter). Surface energy balance models run with available remotely sensed products prove to be nearly as accurate as the uncalibrated SVAT model forced with in situ data.
机译:瞬时蒸发蒸腾速率和地表水分胁迫水平可以通过地表能量收支从遥感的地表温度数据中得出。可以定义两种方法:上下文方法,其中应力水平在给定图像上缩放以用于特定植被覆盖的热/干和冷/湿像素之间,以及单像素方法,其将潜热评估为残差。一个像素的表面能平衡独立于其他像素。在一个生长季节(12月至5月),针对4 km×4 km的灌溉农业区域,应用了四种模型,两种上下文(S-SEBI和改进的三角方法,称为VIT)和两种单像素(TSEB,SEBS)。墨西哥北部半干旱。将它们在局部和空间角度的性能与在该区域七个位置获取的能量平衡数据进行了比较,并与未经校准的土壤-植被-大气转移(SVAT)模型进行了比较,该模型采用了包括观察到的灌溉和灌溉在内的局部原位数据降雨量。大多数模型并不总是能够很好地恢复应力水平,但是S-SEBI和TSEB尽管有一些偏差,但仍显示出良好的性能。当植被处于衰老状态时,所有模型的模型性能都会下降,这主要是由于湍流之间以及潜热通量的土壤/植物成分与可用能量之间分配不均。正如预期的那样,当在同一张图像中遇到对比的土壤水分和植被条件时(因此,尤其是在春季和初夏时),上下文方法会表现良好,而在更均匀的条件下(尤其是在冬天),它们往往会夸大水态的分布。事实证明,与可用的遥感产品一起运行的表面能平衡模型的准确性几乎与未经现场数据强迫的未校准SVAT模型一样准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号