首页> 外文期刊>Human movement science >Higher order balance control: Distinct effects between cognitive task and manual steadiness constraint on automatic postural responses
【24h】

Higher order balance control: Distinct effects between cognitive task and manual steadiness constraint on automatic postural responses

机译:高阶平衡控制:认知任务和手动稳定性约束对自动姿势响应的不同影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present experiment, we aimed to evaluate the interactive effect of performing a cognitive task simultaneously with a manual task requiring either high or low steadiness on APRs. Young volunteers performed the task of recovering upright balance following a mechanical perturbation provoked by unanticipatedly releasing a load pulling the participant's body backwards. The postural task was performed while holding a cylinder steadily on a tray. One group performed that task under high (cylinder round side down) and another one under low (cylinder flat side down) manual steadiness constraint. Those tasks were evaluated in the conditions of performing concurrently a cognitive numeric subtraction task and under no cognitive task. Analysis showed that performance of the cognitive task led to increased body and tray displacement, associated with higher displacement at the hip and upper trunk, and lower magnitude of activation of the GM muscle in response to the perturbation. Conversely, high manual steadiness constraint led to reduced tray velocity in association with lower values of trunk displacement, and decreased rotation amplitude at the ankle and hip joints. We found no interactions between the effects of the cognitive and manual tasks on APRs, suggesting that they were processed in parallel in the generation of responses for balance recovery. Modulation of postural responses from the manual and cognitive tasks indicates participation of higher order neural structures in the generation of APRs, with postural responses being affected by multiple mental processes occurring in parallel. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在本实验中,我们旨在评估同时执行认知任务和需要对APR进行高稳定性或低稳定性的手动任务的交互效果。年轻的志愿者执行了机械扰动后恢复垂直平衡的任务,这种机械扰动是由于意外释放负荷而引起的,将参与者的身体向后拉。在将圆柱体稳固地保持在托盘上的同时执行姿势任务。一组在较高(气缸圆边朝下)的情况下执行该任务,另一组在较低(气缸平底朝下)的手动稳定性约束下执行。这些任务是在同时执行认知数字减法任务和没有认知任务的条件下进行评估的。分析表明,认知任务的执行导致身体和托盘的移位增加,与髋部和上躯干的移位增加,以及响应于微扰的GM肌肉激活程度降低有关。相反,较高的手动稳定性约束导致降低的托盘速度以及较低的躯干位移值,并降低了踝关节和髋关节的旋转幅度。我们发现认知任务和手动任务对APR的影响之间没有相互作用,这表明它们在平衡恢复响应的生成中是并行处理的。来自手动和认知任务的姿势反应的调节表明,高级神经结构参与了APR的产生,姿势反应受到并行发生的多个心理过程的影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号