...
首页> 外文期刊>Hospital pharmacy. >Original Article A Comparison of Automated Infusion Device Technology to Prevent Medication Errors in Pediatric and Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients
【24h】

Original Article A Comparison of Automated Infusion Device Technology to Prevent Medication Errors in Pediatric and Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients

机译:原始文章预防小儿和成人重症监护病房患者用药错误的自动输液设备技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare possible differences in the proportion of medication errors associated with high-risk medications that were avoided by the use of automated infusion device (AID) technology in pediatric and adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. A secondary purpose was to investigate the number of serious adverse drug events (ADEs) identified by root-cause analyses (RCA). Method: The study included pediatric and adult patients receiving high-risk medications by continuous infusion in an academic medical center with mixed medical-surgical ICUs. A retrospective evaluation of 1 year's data collected prospectively in an AID database was used to compare the proportion of medication errors avoided based on reprogramming events (2.5 times limit as a low threshold) and overrides (10 times limit as high). Information obtained from RCAs was used to compare the proportion of serious ADEs that occurred during the 5-year periods before and after AID implementation.Results: The pediatric population was 1.68 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 2.38) more likely to require a reprogramming event than the adult acute care population for all high-risk medications combined. Significantly more reprogramming events occurred in the pediatric patients with potassium (relative risk [RR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.15 to 6.68) and insulin (RR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.15 to 6.45) infusions. Additionally, there were more overrides in the pediatric compared to the adult population for the high-risk medications (RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.53). The number of serious adverse or sentinel events as identified in RCAs decreased from six before (four deemed preventable by AID technology) to three (zero preventable) after AID implementation. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that AID technology when properly used leads to reductions in medication errors and possibly serious ADEs in critically ill patients receiving high-risk medications. The technology appears to be particularly beneficial in pedi...
机译:目的:比较在儿童和成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者中使用自动输液设备(AID)技术避免的与高风险药物相关的用药错误比例的可能差异。第二个目的是调查通过根本原因分析(RCA)确定的严重不良药物事件(ADE)的数量。方法:该研究包括在学术医疗中心连续输注高危药物的儿科患者和成年患者,其中混合了外科医疗ICU。对AID数据库中前瞻性收集的1年数据进行回顾性评估,用于比较基于重编程事件(低阈值的2.5倍)和超控事件(高阈值的10倍)避免的药物错误比例。从RCA获得的信息用于比较实施AID前后5年内发生的严重ADE的比例。结果:儿科患者发生AED的可能性是1.68倍(95%置信区间[CI],1.18至2.38)。对于所有高风险药物,与成人急性护理人群相比,需要重新编程的事件。在小儿输注钾(相对危险度[RR]为2.77; 95%CI为1.15至6.68)和胰岛素(RR为2.73; 95%CI为1.15至6.45)的儿科患者中发生了更多的重编程事件。此外,与高风险药物的成年人口相比,儿科患者的覆盖率更高(RR,1.82; 95%CI,1.32至2.53)。在RCA中确定的严重不良事件或前哨事件的数量从实施AID之前的六个事件(通过AID技术可预防的四个事件)减少到实施AID之后的三个事件(零个可预防事件)。结论:这项研究表明,正确使用AID技术可以减少接受高风险药物治疗的重症患者的用药错误,并减少严重的ADE。该技术在脚踏车中似乎特别有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号