...
【24h】

The marginalization of astrology among Dutch astronomers in the first half of the 17th century

机译:17世纪上半叶荷兰天文学家将占星术边缘化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the first half of the 17th century, Dutch astronomers rapidly abandoned the practice of astrology. By the second half of the century, no trace of it was left in Dutch academic discourse. This abandonment, in its early stages, does not appear as the result of criticism or skepticism, although such skepticism was certainly known in the Dutch Republic and leading humanist scholars referred to Pico's arguments against astrological predictions. The astronomers, however, did not really refute astrology, but simply stopped paying attention to it, as other questions (in particular the constitution of the universe) became the focus of their scholarship. The underlying physical view of the world, with its idea of celestial influences, remained in vigor much longer. Even convinced anti-Aristotelians, in explaining the world, tried to account for the effects of the oppositions and conjunctions of planets, and similar elements. It is only with Descartes that the by now widespread skepticism about predictions found expression in a philosophy that denied celestial influence.
机译:在17世纪上半叶,荷兰天文学家迅速放弃了占星术。到本世纪下半叶,荷兰的学术话语中已没有任何痕迹。尽管在荷兰共和国确实知道这种怀疑,而且人文科学界的主要学者提到了笔克反对占星学预言的观点,但这种放弃在早期并没有出现是批评或怀疑的结果。但是,天文学家并没有真正反驳占星术,只是停止关注它,因为其他问题(尤其是宇宙的构成)成为他们研究的重点。带有天体影响的概念的世界的基本物理视图在更长的时间内一直处于活跃状态。甚至说服反亚里士多德主义者在解释世界时,也试图解释行星以及类似元素的对立和结合所产生的影响。直到今天笛卡尔才对笛卡尔产生怀疑,这一发现在否认天体影响的哲学中得到了表达。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号