首页> 外文期刊>Health affairs >Public And Private Health Insurance: Stacking Up The Costs-Out-of-pocket health spending, not provider payment rates, primarily accounts for the large difference in costs between those covered by Medicaid and those covered by private health insurance.
【24h】

Public And Private Health Insurance: Stacking Up The Costs-Out-of-pocket health spending, not provider payment rates, primarily accounts for the large difference in costs between those covered by Medicaid and those covered by private health insurance.

机译:公共和私人健康保险:增加自付费用的医疗支出,而不是提供者的支付率,主要是因为Medicaid所涵盖的费用与私人健康保险所涵盖的费用之间存在巨大差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some proposals to expand health insurance coverage for people with low incomes are based on expansions of public programs, such as Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), while others rely on the use of tax subsidies for individuals to purchase private insurance. Analyses of data from the 2005 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey indicate that total medical spending is much lower when coverage is provided by Medicaid or SCHIP than it is when coverage is provided by private insurance. Public insurance is particularly advantageous from the consumer's perspective because associated out-of-pocket spending is far lower.
机译:一些针对低收入人群扩大健康保险覆盖范围的提议是基于公共计划(例如医疗补助计划或州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP))的扩展而提出的,而其他建议则依靠个人使用税收补贴来购买私人保险。对2005年医疗支出小组调查数据的分析表明,由Medicaid或SCHIP提供承保范围的总医疗支出要比由私人保险提供承保范围的总医疗支出低得多。从消费者的角度来看,公共保险特别有利,因为相关的自付费用要低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号