首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Challenges, benefits and weaknesses of intermediate care: results from five UK case study sites.
【24h】

Challenges, benefits and weaknesses of intermediate care: results from five UK case study sites.

机译:中间护理的挑战,好处和缺点:来自英国五个案例研究站点的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors explore the views of practitioners and managers on the implementation of intermediate care for elderly people across England, including their perceptions of the challenges involved in its implementation, and their assessment of the main benefits and weaknesses of provision. Qualitative data were collected in five case study sites (English primary care trusts) via semistructured interviews (n = 61) and focus group discussions (n = 21) during 2003 to 2004. Interviewees included senior managers, intermediate care service managers, clinicians and health and social care staff involved in the delivery of intermediate care. The data were analysed thematically using an approach based on the 'framework' method. Workforce and funding shortages, poor joint working between health and social care agencies and lack of support/involvement on the part of the medical profession were identified as the main challenges to developing intermediate care. The perceived benefits of intermediate care for service-users included flexibility, patient centredness and the promotion of independence. The 'home-like' environment in which services were delivered was contrasted favourably with hospitals. Multidisciplinary teamworking and opportunities for role flexibility were identified as key benefits by staff. Insufficient capacity, problems of access and awareness at the interface between intermediate care and 'mainstream' services combined with poor co-ordination between intermediate care services emerged as the main weaknesses in current provision. Despite reported benefits for service-users and staff, the study indicates that intermediate care does not appear to be achieving its full potential for alleviating pressure within health and social care systems. The strengthening of capacity and workforce, improvements to whole systems working and the promotion of intermediate care among doctors and other referrers were identified as key future priorities.
机译:作者探讨了从业者和管理者对于在英格兰实施老年人中间护理的观点,包括他们对实施老年人护理所面临的挑战的看法,以及他们对提供服务的主要利弊的评估。在2003年至2004年期间,通过半结构化访谈(n = 61)和焦点小组讨论(n = 21)在五个案例研究站点(英语初级护理信托)中收集了定性数据。受访者包括高级经理,中级护理服务经理,临床医生和卫生保健以及提供中间护理的社会护理人员。使用基于“框架”方法的方法对数据进行主题分析。劳动力和资金短缺,卫生和社会护理机构之间的联合工作不力以及医疗行业缺乏支持/参与被认为是发展中间护理的主要挑战。为服务使用者提供中间护理的好处包括灵活性,以患者为中心和促进独立性。与医院相比,提供服务的“类似家庭”的环境形成了鲜明的对比。员工将多学科团队合作和角色灵活性的机会确定为主要利益。能力不足,在中间护理和“主流”服务之间的接口处的获取和意识问题,以及中间护理服务之间的协调不佳,成为当前提供服务的主要弱点。尽管据报道对服务使用者和工作人员都有好处,但该研究表明,中间护理似乎并未充分发挥其缓解卫生和社会护理系统压力的潜力。增强能力和劳动力,改进整个系统的工作以及在医生和其他推荐人中促进中间护理被确定为未来的重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号