...
首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Are primary care groups and trusts consulting local communities?
【24h】

Are primary care groups and trusts consulting local communities?

机译:初级保健团体和信托机构是否正在咨询当地社区?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Primary care groups and trusts (PCG/Ts) in the English NHS were established in 1999 and have responsibility for providing and commissioning health-care for around 100 000 people. PCG/Ts are dominated by health professionals, but are responsible for representing the interests of the local community. This paper assesses how they have informed and consulted local communities and the perceived impact of this consultation on decision-making. The paper uses evidence from the National Tracker Survey of PCG/Ts, a longitudinal survey of 72 (15%) of the PCG/Ts in England, using data from telephone interviews with chairs and chief officers, and postal questionnaires to lay board members and representatives of Community Health Councils (CHCs). Eighty-one per cent of PCG/Ts had public involvement working groups. Methods of consulting the community included consulting CHCs (87%), holding public meetings (75%) and consulting local patient groups (67%). Only 31% of chairs felt they were effective at consulting. Ninety-two per cent of CHC representatives attended all board meetings. Most CHC representatives reported that there had been little or no consultation with the CHC in areas such as commissioning, service development or clinical governance. Only 14% of CHC representatives rated PCG/T consultation with the public as effective. Eighty-seven per cent said that local communities were largely unaware of the existence of PCG/Ts, and 70% commented on the weaknesses in PCG/T efforts at public consultation. Public participation is being taken seriously by PCG/Ts, but most are struggling to develop effective ways of involving local communities. Efforts to involve the public may become little more than token gestures. The proposed abolition of CHCs may make it more difficult for PCG/Ts to obtain a lay perspective. Effective consultation requires the development of new methods and adequate resources, but a stronger lay voice in the governance structures of PCG/Ts is needed.
机译:英格兰NHS中的初级保健团体和信托(PCG / Ts)成立于1999年,负责为约10万人提供和启用保健服务。 PCG / T由卫生专业人员主导,但有责任代表当地社区的利益。本文评估了他们如何为当地社区提供信息和咨询,以及这种咨询对决策的影响。该论文使用了PCG / T国家追踪调查的证据,对英格兰72个PCG / T进行了纵向调查(占15%),使用了与主席和首席执行官的电话访谈数据以及邮政问卷对董事会成员和社区卫生委员会(CHC)的代表。 PCG / T的81%都有公众参与的工作组。咨询社区的方法包括咨询社区卫生中心(87%),举行公开会议(75%)和咨询当地患者群体(67%)。只有31%的椅子认为他们在咨询方面很有效。 CHC代表中有92%参加了所有董事会会议。大多数CHC代表报告说,在调试,服务开发或临床治理等领域,与CHC的咨询很少或没有。 CHC代表中只有14%认为与公众进行PCG / T咨询有效。 87%的受访者表示,当地社区基本上不了解PCG / T的存在,而70%的受访者对PCG / T在公众咨询方面的工作存在的弱点发表了评论。 PCG / Ts十分重视公众的参与,但是大多数人都在努力开发有效的方法来让当地社区参与。公众参与的努力可能只不过是象征性的手势而已。建议废除CHC可能会使PCG / T更加难以获得外行的观点。有效的磋商需要开发新的方法和充足的资源,但是需要在PCG / T的治理结构中发出更坚定的声音。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号