...
首页> 外文期刊>Health & place >Rural tobacco use across the United States: How rural and urban areas differ, broken down by census regions and divisions
【24h】

Rural tobacco use across the United States: How rural and urban areas differ, broken down by census regions and divisions

机译:全美国农村的烟草使用:农村和城市地区的差异,按人口普查地区和地区划分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This project compared urban/rural differences in tobacco use, and examined how such differences vary across regions/divisions of the U.S. Using pooled 2012-2013 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), we obtained weighted prevalence estimates for the use of cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, chewing tobacco, snuff, cigars, and pipes. NSDUH also provides information on participants' residence: rural vs. urban, and Census region and division. Overall, use of cigarettes, chew, and snuff were higher in rural, compared to urban areas. Across all tobacco products, urban/rural differences were particularly pronounced in certain divisions (e.g., the South Atlantic). Effects did not appear to be fully explained by differences in poverty. Going beyond previous research, these findings show that urban/rural differences vary across different types of tobacco products, as well as by division of the country. Results underscore the need for regulatory efforts that will reduce health disparities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:该项目比较了烟草使用中的城市/农村差异,并研究了美国各地区/地区之间的差异如何变化。使用全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)汇总的2012-2013年数据,我们得出了加权平均吸烟率估计值使用香烟,薄荷卷烟,咀嚼烟草,鼻烟,雪茄和烟斗。 NSDUH还提供有关参与者居住地的信息:农村与城市以及人口普查地区和分区。总体而言,与城市地区相比,农村地区的吸烟,咀嚼和鼻烟使用率更高。在所有烟草制品中,某些地区(例如南大西洋)的城乡差异特别明显。贫穷差异似乎并未充分解释其影响。这些发现超出了以往的研究范围,表明城乡差异在不同类型的烟草产品之间以及按国家划分而有所不同。结果强调需要采取监管措施来减少健康差异。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号