首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Two center, randomized pilot study of migraine prophylaxis comparing paradigms using pre-emptive frovatriptan or daily topiramate: Research and clinical implications
【24h】

Two center, randomized pilot study of migraine prophylaxis comparing paradigms using pre-emptive frovatriptan or daily topiramate: Research and clinical implications

机译:两项偏头痛预防的中心随机先导研究,比较了先发制人的frovatriptan或每日托吡酯的使用范式:研究和临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective.- To compare the efficacy and clinical benefit of 2 paradigms of migraine prevention using pre-emptive frovatriptan and daily topiramate. The study compares the paradigms of pre-emptive use of frovatriptan, a drug approved for acute migraine, and the daily use of topiramate, a Federal Drug Administration-approved and -accepted standard for migraine prophylaxis. Background.- Traditionally, preventive treatment of migraine required daily medication. However, recent studies suggest that pre-emptive prophylaxis may be beneficial to those migraineurs who can predict an attack of migraine based on premonitory symptoms and treat during that phase. Methods.- A total of 76 adult subjects with a diagnosis of migraine were screened for the study. During a 1-month baseline period, subjects demonstrated through a daily diary that they predicted at least 50% of migraine attacks during the premonitory phase and treated with their usual medication. Of these, 55 were randomized to either Group A (daily topiramate) or Group B (frovatriptan during premonitory symptoms); 44 completed the study. The treatment period lasted 2 months. The subjects answered the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire at randomization, and at Weeks 4 and 8. The revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire was answered 24 hours after taking frovatriptan (Group A, for break-through headaches; Group B, treatment during premonitory symptoms). Results.- The number of migraine attacks and headache days per month decreased significantly from baseline for both Groups A and B. Subjects in Group A had considerably more adverse events leading to study withdrawal than in Group B (18% vs 4%). Though this study was not powered to directly compare the efficacy of the 2 drugs, topiramate showed superiority over frovatriptan at Month 2 in reduction of headache days, which was a secondary end point in the study (P =.036). Conclusions.- This pilot study demonstrated that statistical benefit for reduction of headache days over baseline for both pre-emptive frovatriptan and daily topiramate. Subjects utilizing pre-emptive frovatriptan experienced fewer adverse events leading to study withdrawal. Subjects utilizing daily topiramate had fewer headache days at Month 2.
机译:目的-比较先发制人的frovatriptan和每日使用topiramate两种偏头痛预防方法的疗效和临床获益。该研究比较了先行使用氟伐曲坦(一种批准用于急性偏头痛的药物)和每日使用托吡酯(一种经美国联邦药物管理局批准并接受的偏头痛预防标准)的范例。背景-传统上,偏头痛的预防性治疗需要每天用药。然而,最近的研究表明,先发制人的预防可能对那些可以根据先兆症状预测偏头痛发作并在该阶段进行治疗的偏头痛患者有益。方法。-共筛选出76名诊断为偏头痛的成年受试者进行研究。在为期1个月的基准期内,受试者通过每日日记证明,他们预测在监护期至少发生50%的偏头痛发作,并用常规药物治疗。其中,有55人被随机分为A组(每日托吡酯)或B组(在症状发作前使用去甲曲普坦)。 44完成了研究。治疗期持续2个月。受试者在随机分组以及第4周和第8周回答了偏头痛特定生活质量调查表。服用氟哌曲坦后24小时对偏头痛问卷的修订版患者知觉进行了回答(A组为突破性头痛; B组为治疗期间的头痛)。前症状)。结果。-A组和B组每月偏头痛发作和头痛天数均较基线明显减少。A组受试者的不良事件导致研究退出的发生率高于B组(18%比4%)。尽管这项研究无法直接比较这两种药物的疗效,但托吡酯在第二个月就减少头痛天数方面显示出优于夫伐曲普坦,这是该研究的次要终点(P = .036)。结论。-这项先导研究表明,先发制宜的frovatriptan和每日托吡酯均比基线减少头痛天的统计学益处。使用先发性frovatriptan的受试者经历的不良事件较少,导致研究退出。每天使用托吡酯的受试者在第二个月的头痛天数减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号