...
首页> 外文期刊>Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus. >Effects of Liming on the Aquatic Fauna in a Norwegian Watershed: Why Do Crustaceans and Fish Respond Differently?
【24h】

Effects of Liming on the Aquatic Fauna in a Norwegian Watershed: Why Do Crustaceans and Fish Respond Differently?

机译:黎明对挪威流域水生动物的影响:为什么甲壳类和鱼类的反应不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We studied the effects of liming on fish and crustaceans in a watershed which is in a region known to have one of the highest diversity of aquatic biota in Norway.This watershed,Enningdal,is shared between Norway (1/3) and Sweden (2/3) and includes 61 lakes > 1.0 ha in Norway.Liming started on a large scale in the 1980s.Currently,a total of 26 of lakes (43%) are limed,covering 93% of the total lake area.The mean value +-S.D.of pH and the concentration of inorganic labile Al in these lakes is 6.62+-0.35 and 3 +-4 mu g l-1 respectively.Historical data of fish communities have been obtained from surveys,while test-fishing and sampling of crustaceans were conducted in 24 lakes in recent years (2002-2004).The present study shows that crustaceans to a greater extent than fish has responded to improved water quality after more than 20 years of liming.Of a total of 120 fish populations,42 (35%) have gone extinct.Only five of the lost fish populations (12%) have been re-established,all due to human re-introductions.Physical barriers are considered to be the main factor preventing fish from invading limed lakes.In contrast,crustaceans have been re-established in most limed lakes.This may be mainly due to their good spreading capacity.However,they might also have survived in refuges within the watershed,or as resting-eggs in the sediment.
机译:我们研究了石灰对流域鱼类和甲壳类动物的影响,该流域是挪威水生生物多样性最高的地区之一。恩宁达尔(Enningdal)流域由挪威(1/3)和瑞典(2)分享/ 3),其中包括61个> 1.0公顷的湖泊。挪威于1980年代开始大规模撒石灰。目前,共有26个湖泊(43%)被石灰化,覆盖了总湖泊面积的93%。这些湖泊的pH + -SD和无机不稳定铝的浓度分别为6.62 + -0.35和3 + -4μgl-1。通过调查获得了鱼类群落的历史数据,同时进行了捕捞和抽样捕捞近年来(2002-2004年)在24个湖泊中进行了甲壳类动物研究。本研究表明,经过20多年的剥蚀,甲壳类动物对鱼类的改善水质的响应程度超过鱼类。在120个鱼类种群中,42 (35%)灭绝了。只有五只失落的鱼类种群(12%)被重建,这都是由于人工屏障被认为是阻止鱼类入侵石灰湖的主要因素。相比之下,大多数石灰湖中已经重建了甲壳类动物。这可能主要是由于其良好的扩散能力。在流域内的避难所中或作为沉积物中的休憩卵也得以幸存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号