首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Model-based comparison of two ways to enhance WWTPcapacity under stormwater conditions
【24h】

Model-based comparison of two ways to enhance WWTPcapacity under stormwater conditions

机译:在雨水条件下提高污水处理能力的两种方法的基于模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two different approaches to increase the fraction of combined water treated in the wastewatertreatment plant (WWTP) which would otherwise contribute to combined sewer overflows (CSO)are presented and compared based on modelling results with regard to their efficiencies duringvarious rain events. The first option is to generally increase the WWTP inflow according to its actual capacity rather than pre-setting a maximum that applies to worst case loading. In the second option the WWTP inflow is also increased, however, the extra inflow of combinedwater is bypassing the activated sludge tank and directly discharged to the secondary clarifier.Both approaches have their advantages. For the simulated time series with various rain events,the reduction of total COD load from CSOs and WWTP effluent discharged to the receiving waterwas up to 20% for both approaches. The total ammonia load reduction was between 6% forthe bypass and 11% for inflow increase. A combination of both approaches minimises theadverse effects and the overall emission to the receiving water.
机译:提出了两种不同的方法来增加废水处理厂(WWTP)中处理的合并水的比例,否则将导致合并的下水道溢流(CSO),并根据建模结果对其在各种降雨事件中的效率进行了比较。第一种选择是根据污水处理厂的实际容量来增加污水处理厂的流入量,而不是预先设置适用于最坏情况负荷的最大值。在第二种方案中,污水处理厂的入水量也增加了,但是多余的混合水绕过了活性污泥池,直接排入了二级澄清池。两种方法都有其优势。对于具有各种降雨事件的模拟时间序列,两种方法均减少了从CSO和排放到接收水的WWTP废水的总COD负荷。旁路的总氨气负荷减少量为6%,而流入量的总氨气负荷减少量为11%。两种方法的组合可最大程度地减少不利影响和对接收水的总体排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号