首页> 外文期刊>VINE >Taiwanese executive practice knowledge management in mainland China and Southeast Asia (Malaysia)
【24h】

Taiwanese executive practice knowledge management in mainland China and Southeast Asia (Malaysia)

机译:在中国大陆和东南亚(马来西亚)的台湾行政人员实践知识管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – Many scholars and practitioners argue about the Taiwanese government policy of investing in “Go-South” or “Go-West” approach. Therefore, this paper aims to present data from two groups showing the differences of Taiwanese executives in China and in Malaysia from the point of view of knowledge management (KM) usage. Design/methodology/approach – Knowledge management is very important since enterprises are eager to create value through the better use of knowledge in today's globalization trend. In this study, the State of Knowledge Management: An Assessment Questionnaire, which includes 19 KM tools, was used to identify various kinds of KM tools usage frequencies. Data were collected from 200 firms in China and Malaysia. These firms represent several manufacturing industries, including food, textiles, rubbers and plastics, electronics, and metal manufacturing. Findings – The results show that executives in China have higher scores in 16 KM tools than executives in Malaysia, which means the former executives practice KM more than the later executives. Chinese people in both Taiwan and China share the same traditional values of respect for age, authority, hierarchy, culture, and language. Therefore, cultural and contextual variables differences may not affect the mix of knowledge-sharing problems. Originality/value – This paper reveals useful information showing the differences of Taiwanese executives in China and in Malaysia from the point of view of KM usage.
机译:目的–许多学者和实践者争论台湾政府对“南向”或“西向”投资的政策。因此,本文旨在提供两组数据,从知识管理(KM)的使用角度显示台湾高管在中国和马来西亚的差异。设计/方法/方法–知识管理非常重要,因为企业渴望通过在当今全球化趋势中更好地利用知识来创造价值。在这项研究中,知识管理状态:评估问卷(包括19个KM工具)被用来识别各种KM工具使用频率。数据来自中国和马来西亚的200家公司。这些公司代表了几个制造业,包括食品,纺织,橡胶和塑料,电子和金属制造业。调查结果–结果显示,中国高管在16种知识管理工具方面得分高于马来西亚高管,这意味着前高管比后高管实践知识管理的程度更高。台湾和中国大陆的中国人在尊重年龄,权威,等级,文化和语言方面具有相同的传统价值观。因此,文化和上下文变量的差异可能不会影响知识共享问题的混合。原创性/价值–本文从KM使用的角度揭示了有用的信息,这些信息显示了台湾高管在中国和马来西亚的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号