首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Clinical Pathology >Comparison of white and red blood cell estimates in urine sediment with hemocytometer and automated counts in dogs and cats.
【24h】

Comparison of white and red blood cell estimates in urine sediment with hemocytometer and automated counts in dogs and cats.

机译:用血细胞计数器和狗和猫的自动计数比较尿沉渣中白细胞和红细胞的估计值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Therapeutic decisions regarding urinalysis are commonly based on the presence of white and red blood cells. Traditionally, numbers per high-power field are estimated using wet-mount microscopic examination. This technique is not standardized and counts are likely prone to inaccuracy. In addition, differentiation of leukocyte types is not possible. Objectives: The aims of this study were to (1) compare WBC and RBC estimates using wet-mount examination with counts obtained using a hemocytometer, (2) assess if a hematology automated analyzer (Sysmex ST-2000iV/XT) provides reliable WBC and RBC counts in urine comparable to hemocytometer counts, and (3) evaluate air-dried Wright-Giemsa-stained urine drop sediment preparations for the determination of differential leukocyte counts. Methods: WBC and RBC counts were obtained by performing wet-mount estimates, manual hemocytometer counts, and Sysmex automated counts on 219 canine and feline urine samples. Results were correlated using Spearman rank correlation. Air-dried Wright-Giemsa stained sediment drop preparations (n=215) were examined for differential counts of leukocytes. Results: A low but significant association was found between WBC estimates on wet-mount examination and hemocytometer counts (rho=0.37, P<.01). There was a high and significant association when RBC counts were compared between wet-mount and hemocytometer evaluation (rho=0.7, P<.01). There was very high and significant interassay correlation between Sysmex data from duplicate samples for what the analyzer classified as WBC (rho=0.97, P<.01) and RBC (rho=0.94, P<.01). Low correlations were found between the Sysmex RBC counts and both wet-mount estimates and hemocytometer RBC counts (rho=0.43, P<.01 and rho=0.39, P<.01, respectively). Cell preservation in the air-dried sediment preparations was so poor that differential counts could not be performed. Conclusion: WBC and RBC estimates on wet-mount examination agreed with hemocytometer counts and are therefore considered adequate. The Sysmex ST-2000iV/XT did not provide reliable cell counts under the conditions used.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12004
机译:背景:关于尿液分析的治疗决策通常基于白细胞和红细胞的存在。传统上,使用湿式显微镜检查来估算每个高倍视野的数量。此技术尚未标准化,计数可能容易出现错误。另外,不可能区分白细胞类型。目的:本研究的目的是(1)将湿法检查对WBC和RBC的估计与血细胞计数器获得的计数进行比较,(2)评估血液学自动分析仪(Sysmex ST-2000iV / XT)是否提供可靠的WBC和尿液中的RBC计数与血细胞计数器相当,并且(3)评估风干的Wright-Giemsa染色的尿滴沉积物制剂,以确定白细胞计数的差异。方法:通过对219只犬和猫尿液样本进行湿量估算,手动血细胞计数和Sysmex自动计数,获得WBC和RBC计数。使用Spearman等级相关将结果相关。检查风干的Wright-Giemsa染色的沉淀滴剂(n = 215)的白细胞计数。结果:在湿式检查的WBC估计值与血球计数器计数之间发现了一个低但显着的关联(rho = 0.37,P <.01)。在湿式安装和血细胞计数器评估之间比较RBC计数时,存在高度显着的相关性(rho = 0.7,P <.01)。对于分析仪分类为WBC(rho = 0.97,P <.01)和RBC(rho = 0.94,P <.01),来自重复样品的Sysmex数据之间存在非常高且显着的批间相关性。在Sysmex RBC计数与湿装量估算值和血细胞计数器RBC计数之间发现低相关性(分别为rho = 0.43,P <.01和rho = 0.39,P <.01)。风干沉积物制剂中的细胞保存能力很差,以至于无法进行差异计数。结论:湿式检查的WBC和RBC估计值与血细胞计数器一致,因此被认为是足够的。 Sysmex ST-2000iV / XT在所使用的条件下无法提供可靠的单元计数。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12004

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号