首页> 外文期刊>Turkish Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences >A Comparison of Alternative Circle Hook (Kahle Hook) and J-Style Hook Performance in Experimental Pelagic Longline Fishery in Turkey
【24h】

A Comparison of Alternative Circle Hook (Kahle Hook) and J-Style Hook Performance in Experimental Pelagic Longline Fishery in Turkey

机译:土耳其实验性延绳钓延绳钓渔业中备用圆钩(Kahle钩)和J型钩的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, circle hooks have been encouraged as an alternative to traditional J-hooks in pelagic longline fisheries to minimize by-catch mortality and injury to sea turtles and other marine wildlife. Prior to this study, circle hooks had not been used by domestic commercial pelagic longliners in Turkey. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of kahle hook comparing with J-style hook baited with sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in pelagic longline fishery in the Aegean coast of Turkey (Kusadasi Bay). We used conventional J-style hooks (Mustad 2315DT-4/0) and kahle hooks (Eagle Claw 142A-6/0) for each fishing operation and compared catch rates, catch compositions of target and non-target species. The relative performance of kahle and traditional J-style hooks was tested during 22 valid pelagic longline fishing operations between August 2010 and December 2012. A total of 2200 hooks were used equally among kahle and J-style hooks consecutively. Captured fish were identified, total and fork lengths were measured, weighed, the time of haul back, and hook type as well as by-catch fish were recorded. A total of 78 fish were caught belonging to 13 species during the samplings. The overall CPUE was 4.73 fishes per 100 hooks for kahle hooks and 2.46 fishes for J-style hooks. For the CPUE of all fishes, the difference was statistically significant (Z = -1.977; P<0.05), in favour of the kahle hook being almost two times greater than the J-style hook. Likewise CPUE was 17007.69 g per 100 hooks for kahle style hooks and 4807.27 g for J-style hooks (Z = -1.997; P<0.05). While no difference was found between two hook models on by-catch species, kahle hooks were more efficient in comparison to J hooks on discard species. Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) had the highest CPUE (2.82) among all species for kahle hooks followed by silver scabbard fish (Lepidopus caudatus), 0.64. For J-style hooks, silver scabbard fish catch had the highest CPUE (0.64) followed by swordfish (0.55).
机译:近年来,在远洋延绳钓渔业中,人们鼓励使用圈钩代替传统的J型钩,以最大程度地减少副渔获物的死亡率以及对海龟和其他海洋野生生物的伤害。在此研究之前,土耳其国内的中上层延绳钓者尚未使用圆钩。这项研究的主要目的是评估土耳其爱琴海沿岸延绳钓延绳钓渔业中使用沙丁鱼(Sardina pilchardus)诱饵与J型钩钓相比的效率。我们在每次捕捞作业中都使用了常规的J型鱼钩(Mustad 2315DT-4 / 0)和kahle鱼钩(Eagle Claw 142A-6 / 0),并比较了捕获率,目标和非目标物种的捕获组成。在2010年8月至2012年12月进行的22次有效的远洋延绳钓捕鱼操作中,对kahle和传统J型鱼钩的相对性能进行了测试。在kahle和J型鱼钩中,平均连续使用了2200个鱼钩。识别捕获的鱼,测量总长度和叉子长度,称重,拖回时间,并记录钩型以及副渔获物。采样期间共捕获了13种鱼类的78条鱼。整体CPUE:每100个钩扣鱼钩使用4.73条鱼,对J型钩鱼使用2.46条鱼。对于所有鱼类的CPUE,差异具有统计学意义(Z = -1.977; P <0.05),有利于kahle钩几乎是J型钩的两倍。同样,对于kahle型钩,CPUE为每100个钩17007.69 g,对于J型钩,CPUE为4807.27 g(Z = -1.997; P <0.05)。虽然在副渔获物种类的两个钩子模型之间没有发现差异,但是与丢弃物种类的J钩子相比,kahle钩子效率更高。在所有物种中,剑鱼(Xiphias gladius)的kahle钩CPUE最高(2.82),其次是银鞘鱼(Lepidopus caudatus),为0.64。对于J型鱼钩,银鞘鱼的CPUE最高(0.64),其次是剑鱼(0.55)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号